2020
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1817107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UHPC jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge piers with low flexural reinforcement ratios: experimental investigation and three-dimensional finite element modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher mesh size could overestimate the damage region while using CDP. Additionally, the CDP concrete model does not shows any convincing results in reverse cyclic condition 19 . Some of the potential sources of errors are inaccurate material data input for the CDP model, inaccurate constraints between the different concrete components and highly distorted mesh elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A higher mesh size could overestimate the damage region while using CDP. Additionally, the CDP concrete model does not shows any convincing results in reverse cyclic condition 19 . Some of the potential sources of errors are inaccurate material data input for the CDP model, inaccurate constraints between the different concrete components and highly distorted mesh elements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For the analysis of a reinforced concrete frame, Alfarah et al 33 employed a value of 13. Tong et al 19 Employed 20 to represent the cyclic behavior of a concrete column. The non-linear behavior of a three-dimensional beam was studied by 34 using dilation angles ranging from 20 to 50.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, although the GSS connection provides an effective interconnection of rebar for precast segmental bridge piers, the concrete at the joint remains non-continuous, setting these piers apart from cast-in-place piers in terms of the overall integrity and seismic performance [22]. Extensive research indicates that precast segmental piers connected with a GSS connection exhibit inferior strength and displacement ductility compared to their cast-in-place counterparts [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To restore the bearing capacity of damaged columns, several methods have been developed to provide additional reinforcement, including the enlarging section method [ 5 , 6 ], steel plate method [ 7 , 8 ], steel mesh wrap method [ 9 , 10 ], FRP strip method [ 11 , 12 ], and FRP jacketing method [ 13 , 14 ]. Although steel material and concrete material are easy and cheap to obtain, additional concrete mortar is required in these steel methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%