2002
DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.55.607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UK-2A, B, C and D, Novel Antifungal Antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. 517-02 VI(2). Structure-activity Relationships of UK-2A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yeast and filamentous fungi represented 10.3% of the latter. These results confirm that the actinomycetes are able to produce a wide variety of antibiotics with antifungal activity (Asolkar et al, 2002;Usuki et al, 2002). A general analysis of the results (Table 2) points to a higher recovery of actinomycetes in NGB and HC samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Yeast and filamentous fungi represented 10.3% of the latter. These results confirm that the actinomycetes are able to produce a wide variety of antibiotics with antifungal activity (Asolkar et al, 2002;Usuki et al, 2002). A general analysis of the results (Table 2) points to a higher recovery of actinomycetes in NGB and HC samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…While the development of fenpicoxamid as a fungicide for the cereals market validates the fermentation product itself as an effective antifungal entity, several efforts have undertaken semi‐synthetic modification of UK‐2A in pursuit of further activity enhancements. In this regard, we recently described the effects on antifungal activity of modifications to, or replacement of, the picolinic acid moiety with 19 arylcarboxylates, extending the earlier efforts of Usuki et al These latter authors also explored mimicking the antimycin A macrocycle in a ‘modified UK‐2A’ by replacement of the benzyl and isobutyryl ester groups at positions 8 and 7, respectively, with n ‐butyl and 3‐Me‐butyryl substituents both independently and simultaneously . Although no antifungal data were presented, these changes had minimal impact on potency as respiratory inhibitors, indicating some tolerance for structural modification in these positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…UK‐2A presents several structural features amenable to semi‐synthetic modification, notably the isobutyryl ester and benzyl substituents at positions 7 and 8, respectively, of the bislactone ring as well as the picolinamide ring attached at C3 via the amide linkage. Previous structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies established that both the picolinamide 3‐OH group of UK‐2A and the stereochemistry at C3 of the bislactone macrocycle, the point of attachment of the amide linker, are structural features critical for inhibitory potency. Methylation of the former eliminated biological activity while the R ‐epimer at C3 was some 40–50‐fold less potent than the natural S ‐epimer (shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%