2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.piel.2021.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Úlceras perianales que no se curan debido al abuso de una pomada hemorroidal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with other reported cases of PAU induced by antihemorrhoidal ointments, laboratory tests and histology did not support any other diagnosis. Discontinuing the ointment resulted in rapid improvement of the ulcers, further supporting the ointment as the cause of the lesions 4–6 . However, PAUs are a diagnosis of exclusion, as there is no consensus on specific diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with other reported cases of PAU induced by antihemorrhoidal ointments, laboratory tests and histology did not support any other diagnosis. Discontinuing the ointment resulted in rapid improvement of the ulcers, further supporting the ointment as the cause of the lesions 4–6 . However, PAUs are a diagnosis of exclusion, as there is no consensus on specific diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Overall, the time between the start of ointment use and the development of lesions is 8 to 32 weeks (Table ). [4][5][6] In addition, one case reported PAU induced by betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% and clotrimazole 1% after 12 weeks. 7 The active ingredient most likely responsible for skin damage in antihemorrhoidal ointments is topical steroids, as observed in these two cases with hydrocortisone acetate and in other reported cases involving triamcinolone and betamethasone dipropionate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations