2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-49674-9_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate Automizer with Two-track Proofs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared FuncTion against the tools participating to SV-COMP 2016 : AProVE [34], SeaHorn [21,38] and UAutomizer [22]. We did not compare with other tools such as T2 [6] and 2LS [9] since FuncTion does not yet support the input format of T2 and bit-precise integer semantics (like 2LS does).…”
Section: Implementation and Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also compared FuncTion against the tools participating to SV-COMP 2016 : AProVE [34], SeaHorn [21,38] and UAutomizer [22]. We did not compare with other tools such as T2 [6] and 2LS [9] since FuncTion does not yet support the input format of T2 and bit-precise integer semantics (like 2LS does).…”
Section: Implementation and Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAutomizer [22] is a software model checker based on an automata-theoretic approach to software verification [23]. Similarly to Terminator, it reduces proving termination to proving that no program state is repeatedly visited (and it is not covered by the current termination argument), and composes termination arguments by repeatedly invoking a ranking function synthesis tool [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to solve these instances efficiently, we propose a greedy algorithm that finds suboptimal solutions (Section 5.1). As a proof of concept, we implemented the algorithm and evaluated it in the context of the automata-based software verifier Ultimate Automizer [24,26] (Section 5.2).…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method is based on a reduction to termination analysis for sequential programs: we translate a π-calculus process P to a sequential program S P , so that if S P is terminating, so is P . The reduction allows us to use powerful, mature methods and tools for termination analysis of sequential programs [17,14,24,21,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%