2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings on sand overlying clay under inclined loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the failure mechanism of the composite foundation depicted in Figure 6a,b, it can be seen that, when T s /L = 0.1 and ϕ = 20 • , a "punching-through" failure pattern is developed in region (f 1 ), which includes a rigid block near the pile beneath the footing, a passive wedge at lower right of the wheel in the sand layer, and a fan in the lower clay layer. Similar conclusions are also reported by Zheng et al (2018) [23] in their investigation of the failure mechanism of the strip footing in sand-over-clay soil deposit. In addition, more evident plastic strain areas (f 2 ) and (f 3 ) at the interface of the two soil layers and the plastic strain areas (f 4 ) under the wheel are captured when T s /L = 0.1 and ϕ = 20 • as compared to that of ϕ = 40 • .…”
Section: Effects Of Sand Layer Thickness and Soil Properties (S Um K And ϕ)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the failure mechanism of the composite foundation depicted in Figure 6a,b, it can be seen that, when T s /L = 0.1 and ϕ = 20 • , a "punching-through" failure pattern is developed in region (f 1 ), which includes a rigid block near the pile beneath the footing, a passive wedge at lower right of the wheel in the sand layer, and a fan in the lower clay layer. Similar conclusions are also reported by Zheng et al (2018) [23] in their investigation of the failure mechanism of the strip footing in sand-over-clay soil deposit. In addition, more evident plastic strain areas (f 2 ) and (f 3 ) at the interface of the two soil layers and the plastic strain areas (f 4 ) under the wheel are captured when T s /L = 0.1 and ϕ = 20 • as compared to that of ϕ = 40 • .…”
Section: Effects Of Sand Layer Thickness and Soil Properties (S Um K And ϕ)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Existing understandings only cover the failure mechanisms of conventional types of foundations in such sand-overlying-clay soil profiles [18][19][20][21][22]. For example, Zheng et al (2018) [23] found a 'punch-through' failure pattern for strip footings in the sand-over-clay layered deposits, where the upper sand block is pushed into the underlying clay due to the vertical compression under V-H-M combined loadings. However, the bearing capacities and failure mechanisms of this composite foundation are still not well investigated in such soil conditions.…”
Section: Introduction 1conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close examination of Figs. 6a and 6b reveals that the influence of non-dimensional frequency on the vertical and horizontal bearing capacities of surface footing under various modified pseudo-dynamic loading scenarios becomes fairly negligible beyond the load inclination angle of about 30 o , as all curves converge afterwards.As shown in Fig.6c, the general shapes of the yield surfaces in the normalized 𝑉 − 𝐻 plane are well described by a parabolic form, as also observed in several previous studies(Loukidis et al 2008;Krabbenhoft et al 2012;Zheng et al 2019; among others). In all failure envelopes, 𝐻/𝑉 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐) first increases with 𝑉/𝑉 𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐) until it reaches a maximum value.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, MARS does not need any assumption between input and output variables. MARS is suitable for high-dimensional issues that contain many input and output variables (e.g., Zheng et al, 2019b;Zhang et al, 2019;Jearsiripongkul et al, 2022;Lai et al, 2022;Sirimontree et al, 2022;Yodsomjai et al, 2022).…”
Section: Figure 14mentioning
confidence: 99%