2010
DOI: 10.1049/el.2010.0986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-broad bandwidth and low-loss GCPW-MS transitions on low- k substrates

Abstract: International audienceA study of back-to-back grounded coplanar waveguide-microstrip (GCPW-MS) transitions is presented. By using low-permittivity substrates, both the attenuation and the bandwidth can be improved. An ultra-broad bandwidth up to 77 GHz could be obtained with the BCB polymer as substrate in thin film on low-resistivity silicon wafers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, low permittivity obtained by micromachining substrates allows to get low-dispersive waveguides (quasi TEM approximation) and to realize coplanar transmission lines with very high bandwidth without excessive dispersion and loss (Newham, 2006). The main reason for the high cut-off frequency improvement of GCPW-MS-GCPW transitions is that the guided wavelength is bigger in low-k substrate for a given frequency, so the parasitic resonance between the backside conductor and the coplanar ground strips takes place at higher frequency (El-Gibari, et al, 2010a). In addition, as for low effective permittivities a large part of the energy is propagating in air medium, so losses can be minimized.…”
Section: Influence Of the Substrate Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, low permittivity obtained by micromachining substrates allows to get low-dispersive waveguides (quasi TEM approximation) and to realize coplanar transmission lines with very high bandwidth without excessive dispersion and loss (Newham, 2006). The main reason for the high cut-off frequency improvement of GCPW-MS-GCPW transitions is that the guided wavelength is bigger in low-k substrate for a given frequency, so the parasitic resonance between the backside conductor and the coplanar ground strips takes place at higher frequency (El-Gibari, et al, 2010a). In addition, as for low effective permittivities a large part of the energy is propagating in air medium, so losses can be minimized.…”
Section: Influence Of the Substrate Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transition, from coplanar waveguide to dielectric waveguide, is investigated for the integration of active devices in dielectric waveguides, and allows a maximum insertion loss of 1.7 dB and return loss better than 15 dB over 7% bandwidth at 60 GHz for a total length of 7 mm [10]. Grounded Coplanar Waveguide-Microstrip (GCPW-MS) transition on 8 µm-thick BCB deposited on a metalized low resistivity wafers for a 1 cm back-to-back structure can facilitate the characterization of components driven by MS transmission lines up to 77 GHz with insertion loss better than 2 dB [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PGL lines have already been characterized for higher frequencies by means of transitions: PGL to 50 Ω microstrip line circuit transitions on ceramic substrate (0.254 mm alumina), dedicated to feed PGL loads and power divider/combiner, present, for a 16 mm total length of the back-to-back structure, a 4 dB transmission parameter from 40 GHz to 60 GHz [12], or dedicated to feed couplers with short range (60 GHz) radio [13], a coplanar-Goubau Line transition on Duroid 5880 provides a 5-10 dB insertion loss and a return loss better than −12 dB from 140 GHz to 220 GHz for a back-to-back structure [14] and recently a "smooth" transition to match a periodic leaky-wave antenna at millimeter wave frequencies with PGL impedance to a coplanar waveguide [15]. The results for the transitions to excite the PGL mode [12][13][14][15] seem less efficiency than for the other ones [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]: the PGL doesn't need a ground plane, contrary to the coplanar or micro-strip modes and the conversion from coplanar or micro-strip modes to PGL mode generates other modes or losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also designed a low loss Mach-Zehnder interference (MZI) with high bandwidth using the novel polymers 5 . Structures of waveguide and traveling wave electrodes, such as the coplanar waveguide electrodes (CPWE) and the micro-strip electrodes 6,7 (MSE), were optimized to improve the performance of the modulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%