2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation—A novel and effective ventilation strategy during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
9

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
60
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In none of the studies did the use of 20 bpm result in hypocarbia from excessive ventilation that might lead to neurologic injury. Our findings resemble those of another study, which showed that the use of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume and high respiratory rate during CPR resulted in adequate gas exchange and reduced intrathoracic pressures …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In none of the studies did the use of 20 bpm result in hypocarbia from excessive ventilation that might lead to neurologic injury. Our findings resemble those of another study, which showed that the use of mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume and high respiratory rate during CPR resulted in adequate gas exchange and reduced intrathoracic pressures …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, the compromised pulmonary function depicted by MIGET measurements even before the rst de brillation already hinted at possible thoracic damage or at least insu cient perfusion, although this was neither con rmed by substantial differences in mean arterial blood pressures nor oxygenation impairments between the groups. While MIGET measurements are sophisticated, our group has shown their validity during CPR before (13) . Yet, since no other experimental group uses the technique in this context, systematic aws cannot fully be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Depending on no-ow time, time to drug administration and de brillation methods as well as ventilation settings, ROSC rates ranging from 30% to over 80% are regularly reported (26,27) . While differences between groups can occur randomly and might be due to the small sample sizes (13) , they usually do not reach statistical signi cance. However, the fact that not one animal survived after mCCD2 treatment combined with the damage severity con rmed in those animals causes our group to be con dent that those results are sound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty male German landrace pigs (12-16 weeks, 28-35kg) were acquired from a local farm and received pre-transport sedation via an intramuscular injection of azaperone (2mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (4mg kg -1 ). Once in our Large Animal Research Facility, anaesthesia was induced via an ear cannula (22G) by injecting fentanyl (4µg kg -1 ), propofol (4mg kg -1 ) and atracurium (0.5mg kg -1 ) as described before [18]. During the whole experiment, anaesthesia was maintained via continuous infusion of propofol (5-10mg kg -1 h -1 ) and fentanyl (8-12µg kg -1 h -1 ) as well as a balanced electrolyte infusion (5ml kg -1 h -1 ).…”
Section: Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%