2019 IEEE Nordic Circuits and Systems Conference (NORCAS): NORCHIP and International Symposium of System-on-Chip (SoC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/norchip.2019.8906917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-Low Voltage Subthreshold Binary Adder Architectures for IoT Applications: Ripple Carry Adder or Kogge Stone Adder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCA is the simplest adder with the lowest power, area, and design time suitable for various ultra-low-power IoT (Internet of Things) applications such as implantable biomedical devices, RADAR system, linear convolution, Harr transformation, and fast Fourier transformation [19][20][21][22]. Moreover, it is usually used to design a hybrid adder with other faster adders such as the Carry Lookahead Adder (CLA) and Kogge Stone Adder (KSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RCA is the simplest adder with the lowest power, area, and design time suitable for various ultra-low-power IoT (Internet of Things) applications such as implantable biomedical devices, RADAR system, linear convolution, Harr transformation, and fast Fourier transformation [19][20][21][22]. Moreover, it is usually used to design a hybrid adder with other faster adders such as the Carry Lookahead Adder (CLA) and Kogge Stone Adder (KSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single adder cannot optimally operate to improve the speed, area, leakage current, overall power dissipation, and the design time because there is a trade-off among various adders [23,24]. Although the CLA or the KSA are used for higher speeds, the power consumption, the energy dissipation, and the area consumption for the RCA are far lower than those at the same speed [20]. Nevertheless, the RCA is slower than the CLA or the KSA because of solving the carry propagation problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%