Ultra-Sensitive Potentiometric Measurements of Dilute Redox Molecule Solutions and Determination of Sensitivity Factors at Platinum Ultramicroelectrodes

Abstract

Open circuit potential (OCP) measurements can be very sensitive to small changes in the electrode environment and may allow detection of electron transfer events involving few, and maybe single, electrons. Factors affecting the overall sensitivity of OCP measurements were investigated to achieve the highest sensitivity. The OCP of platinum ultramicroelectrodes (UMEs) was determined in solutions that initially contained only supporting electrolyte where the OCP is a mixed potential governed by background faradaic processes. Then, increasing amounts of a redox couple at equimolar amounts of oxidized and reduced forms were added. In dilute solutions of the redox couple, the OCP deviates from the redox potential because of additional background half reactions occurring at the electrode. These dominate the OCP through their partial current contributions, shifting the OCP to a mixed potential region. The OCP at a platinum UME remains unchanged from the aqueous electrolyte solution mixed potential until ∼10 to 10 M concentrations of redox molecules are reached. At higher concentrations, the OCP moves toward the formal potential of the redox couple and eventually becomes poised at this value. By using a simple surface modification, the sensitivity to changing concentrations can be increased by almost 2 orders of magnitude. Numerical calculations with a Butler-Volmer formalism can estimate the contribution to the OCP mixed potential from background half reaction currents which are used to extract sensitivity factors from the change in potential with respect to current. The relative sensitivity to changing concentrations is shown to increase as the electrode size decreases.

Advanced Characterization Techniques for Evaluating Porosity, Nanopore Tortuosity, and Electrical Connectivity at the Single-Nanoparticle Level

“…As stated in the previous sentence, each step is associated with a potential-step experiment except for drop-casting, and these potential–time profiles are also shown in Figure for clarity. The lines around 0.4 V indicate discrepancies in the experimental open-circuit potential, which arise from different species dominating the two half reactions at the electrode surface when the cell is at open circuit …”

About the amplification factors in organic bioelectronic sensors

“…Here an open circuit potential detection of single metal nanoparticle collisions was achieved, demonstrating how sensitive even electrochemical potentiometric detections can be. 76,77 Fig. 4 Conceptual structure of a bipolar-junction-transistor based on a PEDOT:PSS OECT serving as an amperometric sensor to detect and amplify the faradaic current generated by the species A undergoing an oxidation process in the base region.…”

The Fermi level as an energy reference in liquid jet X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of aqueous solutions

“…The redox couple enables the exchange of charge between a metallic electrode and the solution and aligns the electrochemical potentials. In its absence, the electrode is unpoised: Percival and Bard 37 have shown that the open circuit potential (OCP) varies between ~0 V for a de-aerated solution and 520 mV/NHE for an air-saturated one. The redox couple provides us with a crucial thermodynamic quantity, ∆ r G red/ox sol the (positive) Gibbs energy change (eV/particle) of the oxidation reaction red → ox +e in vacuum at rest at infinity.…”

“…In the absence of a well-defined ferricyanide/ferrocyanide redox couple, the determination of λ OX is normally impracticable, because the electronic levels of water, and in particular the binding energy of the ferrocyanide solute, can be fixed by some unknown "background" couple (see ref 37 ). Nonetheless, considering a solution with the ferrocyanide ion alone, Seidel et al have calculated a λ OX value of 1.47 eV.…”

“…Considering that the pH of the pristine NaCl solution is around 7 (the solution is under constant He purge to avoid CO 2 dissolution 24 ), the change is +5 pH units. If we assume that the "background redox couple" 37 depends on the H + concentration, such as the oxygen reduction reaction, or the proton reduction reaction, this may result in a decrease in the "background redox potential" by −0.059 × 5 = −0.3 V. As VL ∞ − FL will be reduced by the same amount in eV, there are −0.2 eV left for the butylamine dipolar contribution, which is comparable to what we have found for 1-butanol. The present reanalysis of the data of ref.…”