1991
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78417-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafiltration: Partitioning of Milk Constituents into Permeate and Retentate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that maximum mineral removal was obtained by UF at pH 6.6, followed by diafiltration at pH 3-3.5. It has been observed that the rejection of calcium, sodium and phosphorus was higher during diafiltration than UF and that diafiltration of acidified milk gave rise to lower rejections of calcium, phosphorus and sodium (Bastian et al, 1991). Calcium and P recovery in UF concentrates (CF = 5) were 84% for calcium and 66% for P. These were reduced by diafiltration and UF of acidified milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It was observed that maximum mineral removal was obtained by UF at pH 6.6, followed by diafiltration at pH 3-3.5. It has been observed that the rejection of calcium, sodium and phosphorus was higher during diafiltration than UF and that diafiltration of acidified milk gave rise to lower rejections of calcium, phosphorus and sodium (Bastian et al, 1991). Calcium and P recovery in UF concentrates (CF = 5) were 84% for calcium and 66% for P. These were reduced by diafiltration and UF of acidified milk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The milk is then concentrated by UF. During the UF step, caseins, whey proteins, micellar salts, and residual fat are concentrated in the retentate, whereas a portion of lactose, soluble salts, and nonprotein nitrogen are removed with the permeate (Green and others ; Babella ; Bastian and others ). For high‐protein MPCs, such as MPC85, UF alone may not be sufficient to achieve the required protein‐to‐solids ratio in the retentate and, therefore, DF is commonly applied (Getler and others ; Singh ).…”
Section: Production Of Mpcs and Mpismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with milks with artificially added AFM, concentraMilk acidification was performed in order to partially disrupt tions up to 2 ug/L, the UF-DF process resulted in reconstituted the protein fraction (Bastian et al, 1991) with which the AFM, is associated (Applebaum et al, 1982). In our study, acidification of milk from pH 6.6 to 6.0 did not influence removal of AFM, (pcO.05) (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Acidificationmentioning
confidence: 62%