2013
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.03.0085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafine Particle Generation through Atomization Technique: The Influence of the Solution

Abstract: The present work is focused on the characterization of a sub-micrometer aerosol generation system (TSI 3940) in terms of particle number distributions and total concentrations as a function of the solution. Fourteen soluble salts were tested, and different solution molar concentrations were considered.The experimental apparatus was composed of a Submicrometer Aerosol Generator TSI 3940, a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer spectrometer (SMPS 3936, TSI), and a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC TSI 3775).Particle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of using the SMPS system are that PSDs can be measured in a relatively short time, and different dose metrics (e.g., the number, surface area, and volume) of PM 1.0 , ultrafine and nanoparticles can be estimated simultaneously (Cheng et al, 2009;Du et al, 2012;Filep et al, 2013;Fission et al, 2013;Sahu et al, 2013;Stabile et al, 2013;Sarangi et al, 2015). However, the current commercially available SMPS systems (e.g., TSI SMPS 3936 and 3938, USA; GRIMM SMPS+C or SMPS+E, Germany; MSP Wide Range Particle Spectrometer, WPS M1000XP, USA; Palas U-SMPS, Germany) are large, bulky, expensive, and/or use radioactive neutralizers, making them inappropriate for routine exposure monitoring and assessment (Qi and Kulkarni, 2012;Ostraat et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of using the SMPS system are that PSDs can be measured in a relatively short time, and different dose metrics (e.g., the number, surface area, and volume) of PM 1.0 , ultrafine and nanoparticles can be estimated simultaneously (Cheng et al, 2009;Du et al, 2012;Filep et al, 2013;Fission et al, 2013;Sahu et al, 2013;Stabile et al, 2013;Sarangi et al, 2015). However, the current commercially available SMPS systems (e.g., TSI SMPS 3936 and 3938, USA; GRIMM SMPS+C or SMPS+E, Germany; MSP Wide Range Particle Spectrometer, WPS M1000XP, USA; Palas U-SMPS, Germany) are large, bulky, expensive, and/or use radioactive neutralizers, making them inappropriate for routine exposure monitoring and assessment (Qi and Kulkarni, 2012;Ostraat et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2). The particle size distribution of the control aerosol was fine-tuned by varying the gas flow conditions into the atomizer and the concentration of extracted SOA in the solution used for atomization (Stabile et al, 2013), so that a sufficient aerosol mass concentration was obtained at each mobility diameter of interest (35, 60, 85, 110 nm) to permit chemical analysis. Sample blanks for the control experiment were obtained by atomizing pure solvent (Park et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior was attributed to a decrease in Weber and Reynolds numbers, consequently the slow growth of the surface waves . The viscous and surface tension forces were impeding the breakup process; the surface waves were taking time to grow and destabilize the liquid sheet (Stabile et al, 2013). In response, the liquid sheet was not thin enough to initiate fast breakup.…”
Section: Smd Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%