“…The advantages of using the SMPS system are that PSDs can be measured in a relatively short time, and different dose metrics (e.g., the number, surface area, and volume) of PM 1.0 , ultrafine and nanoparticles can be estimated simultaneously (Cheng et al, 2009;Du et al, 2012;Filep et al, 2013;Fission et al, 2013;Sahu et al, 2013;Stabile et al, 2013;Sarangi et al, 2015). However, the current commercially available SMPS systems (e.g., TSI SMPS 3936 and 3938, USA; GRIMM SMPS+C or SMPS+E, Germany; MSP Wide Range Particle Spectrometer, WPS M1000XP, USA; Palas U-SMPS, Germany) are large, bulky, expensive, and/or use radioactive neutralizers, making them inappropriate for routine exposure monitoring and assessment (Qi and Kulkarni, 2012;Ostraat et al, 2013).…”