2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafine SnO 2 nanoparticles as a high performance anode material for lithium ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, for both set of cells, the best performance was obtained when doping with Li at 20% cat., which seems reasonable since the experimental results obtained from ICP-OES shows that effective amount of Li was higher for these samples. Regarding the capacities reported for SnO 2 and TiO 2 materials, our results provide reasonable values over the nominal capacities taking into account the amount of active material in the electrode (see Supplementary Information File), and are quite comparable with the capacities recently reported 24,41,42 . Also the initial capacity values are higher than the theoretical ones specially for the h-SnLi30 and h-SnLi20 and the h-TiLi0-a.…”
Section: Results and Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, for both set of cells, the best performance was obtained when doping with Li at 20% cat., which seems reasonable since the experimental results obtained from ICP-OES shows that effective amount of Li was higher for these samples. Regarding the capacities reported for SnO 2 and TiO 2 materials, our results provide reasonable values over the nominal capacities taking into account the amount of active material in the electrode (see Supplementary Information File), and are quite comparable with the capacities recently reported 24,41,42 . Also the initial capacity values are higher than the theoretical ones specially for the h-SnLi30 and h-SnLi20 and the h-TiLi0-a.…”
Section: Results and Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results suggest that SnO 2 cannot maintain the material structure of SnO 2 -based LIB electrodes because of its volume change during the charging–discharging processes. In addition, in the cycling process, the capacity of SnO 2 -based anode material starts to drop rapidly and has almost no capacity after 50 cycles, as shown in many previous reports [ 20 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Thus, the excellent performance of the CNC–SnO 2 NF500 and CNC–SnO 2 NF800 composite electrodes can only be attributed to the presence of pyrolyzed CNC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A further recent example of SnO 2 nanoparticles includes the fast and scalable microwave‐assisted hydrothermal synthesis of fine particles of about 14 nm in size. An initial discharge capacity of about 1197 mAh g −1 , with a reversible capacity of 520 mAh g −1 (2nd cycle), and a capacity retention of about 53 % (273 mAh g −1 ) after 50 cycles at 100 mA g −1 were reported for this material by Yin et al …”
Section: Nanostructured Phase‐pure Sno2 Lib Anodesmentioning
confidence: 96%