2021
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.3038238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasensitive Strain Sensing by Using Two Parallel Structured Fabry--Perot Interferometers in Cascaded Connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is another optical cavity (Cavity-3) bounded between the interfaces of M1 and M3 with an effective cavity length of L1 + L2 = 639.25 µm. The reflection of the FPI is the result of multi-beam coherent superposition, and it can be well-described using a three-reflector model [29][30][31][32]. The relationship between the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric fields at each interface is depicted in Figure 2c.…”
Section: Sensing Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, there is another optical cavity (Cavity-3) bounded between the interfaces of M1 and M3 with an effective cavity length of L1 + L2 = 639.25 µm. The reflection of the FPI is the result of multi-beam coherent superposition, and it can be well-described using a three-reflector model [29][30][31][32]. The relationship between the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric fields at each interface is depicted in Figure 2c.…”
Section: Sensing Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When light is emitted from the SMF to the sensor, reflections occur at M1, M2, and M3 interfaces. The corresponding electric fields E1, E2, and E3 of the reflected beams can be expressed as follows: The reflection of the FPI is the result of multi-beam coherent superposition, and it can be well-described using a three-reflector model [29][30][31][32]. The relationship between the incident, reflected, and transmitted electric fields at each interface is depicted in Figure 2c.…”
Section: Sensing Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the machining error of 2 µm is induced, the M-factor will be reduced from 48.08 times to 16.45 times, which is only 34.2% of the ideal state, shown in Figure 1. The high M-factor usually needs a ∆ under a sub-micron level, however, in the actual process, the micron-level error is hard to avoid, so most of the M-factor of the TVE FPI is less than 30 times [22][23][24][25][26]. Second, an ultra-high-sensitivity TVE FPI is also limited in the demodulation method using envelope tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%