2011
DOI: 10.1121/1.3655879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient quantitative estimates from high-concentration Chinese hamster ovary cell pellet biophantoms

Abstract: Previous work estimated the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient (BSC) from low-concentration (volume density <3%) Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO, 6.7-μm cell radius) cell pellets. This study extends the work to higher cell concentrations (volume densities: 9.6% to 63%). At low concentration, BSC magnitude is proportional to the cell concentration and BSC frequency dependency is independent of cell concentration. At high cell concentration, BSC magnitude is not proportional to cell concentration and BSC frequency de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 3 shows BSC curves for CHO cell pellets with number densities ranging from 1.25 to 473 million cells/mL (Mcell/mL), and 3 independent replicates per number density [6,7]. These CHO cell pellet (volume densities 0.17% to 63%) BSC results showed good agreement with the concentric fluid spheres theory [5], particularly at lower cell concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Biophantom Qussupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Fig. 3 shows BSC curves for CHO cell pellets with number densities ranging from 1.25 to 473 million cells/mL (Mcell/mL), and 3 independent replicates per number density [6,7]. These CHO cell pellet (volume densities 0.17% to 63%) BSC results showed good agreement with the concentric fluid spheres theory [5], particularly at lower cell concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Biophantom Qussupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The scatterer radius QUS images suggest that fibroadenomas have larger scatterers consistent with the glandular acini radii and that carcinomas have smaller, more uniform scatterer radii [8]. However, it is often difficult to establish a relationship between QUS scatterer property estimates and actual tissue structures (generally identified from optical microscope images) [4], [9]. Oelze and O'Brien compared three scattering models (SGM, FSM and a new cell model to consider backscattering from cell nuclei and cytoskeleton) to examine two mouse models of mammary cancers: carcinomas containing uniformly distributed cells and sarcomas containing cell clusters [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This approach has been successfully used for the characterization of the eye [3], the prostate [4] and the breast [5] [6]. Other theoretical scattering models such that the fluid-filled sphere model [5] [6] or concentric sphere model [6]- [8] were also used to predict average scatterer sizes. The aforementioned models (Gaussian model, fluid-filled sphere model and concentric sphere model) assumed a random distribution of scatterers (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biophantoms had identical cells but had different cell volume fractions ranging from 0.03 to 0.3. As originally proposed in [7], [8], the cell pellet biophantoms are a simplified version of real tissues since only a single cell line is considered. The concentrated biophantoms allow to mimic densely packed cells with controlled cell volume fractions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%