2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic field profile evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous anisotropic materials using 2D ray tracing model: Numerical and experimental comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where V n is the excitation signal of the array element, x and t represent the spatial position and time, respectively, c is the 2 Journal of Sensors sound velocity of the medium, and S T is the array element's area [10,11]. The spatial focusing acoustic field of the ultrasonic annular array transducer is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Influence Of Transducer Parameters Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where V n is the excitation signal of the array element, x and t represent the spatial position and time, respectively, c is the 2 Journal of Sensors sound velocity of the medium, and S T is the array element's area [10,11]. The spatial focusing acoustic field of the ultrasonic annular array transducer is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Influence Of Transducer Parameters Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15] To simulate wave propagation within materials, the speed and wavelength of the propagating wave is used, which can be determined using analytical models or experiments. Ray tracing in various forms have been used in cases of two-dimensional (2D) [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and three-dimensional (3D) 12,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] geometries for modeling wave propagation within the material.…”
Section: Approaches For Near To Real Time Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35][36] Driven by progress in computational methods and electronics, analytical and exact models for performing the simulation tasks exist but their solutions are limited to either simple-shaped structures or artificial damages. The ray tracing method for bulk waves in 2D and 3D has been studied extensively by Ogilvy 23 and Kolkoori et al 17 There are different numerical tools available for modeling Lamb wavebased SHM systems such as the finite element method (FEM), finite difference method (FDM), elastic finite integration technique (EFIT), and spectral FEM (SFEM). The application of FEM and FDM for SHM in plates by Xu et al has been published in the literature.…”
Section: Ultrasonic Guided Wave Modeling With Ray Tracing In Fe Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main challenge is to adapt the probe to the material and the dimension of the block under inspection to reach the required sensitivity and resolution for the detection of cracks or other defects. Ultrasound beam computation is a critical step in the design process (Generazio & Harris, 1999) and depends on the size and the geometry of the emitting element, has been widely studied and can be computed through several methods, such as finite element (Chassignole et al, 2009) or ray tracing (Kolkoori et al, 2013). The ultrasonic testing sensitivity depends on the energy reflected from the flaws relative to a calibration (Cheeke, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%