2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02826.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic properties of sedimentary rocks: effect of pressure, saturation, frequency and microcracks

Abstract: A B S T R A C TSeismic velocities and attenuations are influenced by lithology, porosity and permeability as well as the kind and quantity of the pore fluids. The microstructure of rocks is another important factor influencing seismic properties. This influence can be used to investigate the pressure-dependent closure of microcracks. For this purpose, velocities and attenuations of P and S waves have been determined at ultrasonic frequencies in three different rocks (vacuum dry and partially saturated with wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the different kind of drying: In oven‐dried samples a small amount of moisture is always remaining in the rock. This might have led to modulus reduction (see, e.g., Mayr and Burkhardt [2006] and section 5). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be due to the different kind of drying: In oven‐dried samples a small amount of moisture is always remaining in the rock. This might have led to modulus reduction (see, e.g., Mayr and Burkhardt [2006] and section 5). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic compressional ( v p ) and shear ( v s ) wave velocities in approximately 80 vacuum dry and in approximately 50 fully water saturated samples were determined with a pulse transmission technique in the ultrasonic frequency range (0.4–1.0 MHz) [ Wulff and Burkhardt , 1996, 1997; Mayr , 2002; Mayr and Burkhardt , 2006]. Representative samples (homogeneous mineralogy and without visible cracks) were chosen for these measurements.…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lithologically uniform and conformable strata, sonic velocity is mainly a function of porosity, thus a gradual increase can be expected with depth (cf. Mayr and Burkhardt, 2006). Abrupt offsets of sonic velocities then provide reliable proxies for the positioning of unconformities and even for the calculation of associated stratigraphic loss (Henk, 1992).…”
Section: Identification Of Unconformitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common factors are: a variable degree of rock water content (due to precipitation), variable (non-standardized) contact pressure and transmitting quality between rock and transmitter/receiver probes, influence of rock surface weathering processes, and rock disintegration. The behaviour of ultrasonic velocities in sediments under different pore fluid saturation stages and variable hydrostatic pressures was previously examined in laboratory experiments (Schütt, 1992;Mayr and Burkhardt, 2006).…”
Section: Controls On Ultrasonic Velocity Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have ascribed the dispersion in sandstone to "squirt flow": pore-pressure gradients caused by deformation of compliant pores embedded in the stiffer framework of the sandstone (i.e., microcracks, grain boundaries, etc.) (Mayr and Burkhardt, 2006;Gurevich et al, 2010;Paula and Peruvhina, 2012), and according to this concept, the stress dependency of the elastic moduli of dry sandstone should delimit the possible dispersion in the water-saturated state (Mavko and Jizba, 1991;Shapiro, 2003;Gurevich et al, 2010;David and Zimmerman, 2012). In spite of this theory, dispersion in shaly sandstones has been frequently found to exceed the bounds for dispersion based on the measured stress dependency (Marketos and Best, 2010;Paula and Peruvkhina, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%