Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Transducer Radiation through a Curved Fluid-Solid Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, comparisons of that more general edge element model with models of the type discussed here have shown little difference in their predictions (see reference [31]), so that the stationary phase approximation appears to work well as a foundation for such models, subject to the limitations mentioned previously.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, comparisons of that more general edge element model with models of the type discussed here have shown little difference in their predictions (see reference [31]), so that the stationary phase approximation appears to work well as a foundation for such models, subject to the limitations mentioned previously.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The BDW paraxial models are not able to be generalized easily for nonpiston sources or for focused probes since in these cases the forms present do not allow a direct use of Stokes' theorem [see Eq. (39)l. The BDW paraxial models can be generalized to handle curved interfaces, but they also have the same limitations at caustics as the surface integral model for such cases [30,31]. The edge element model is the most versatile of the models for generalization.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface integral model, for example, could be generalized to nonpiston sources and to focused probes by modifying appropriately the integrand or the surface of integration, respectively, in Eq. (23)] for focusing curved interfaces, there are caustics in the solid where they can fail [30,31]. Similarly, a surface integral model for curved surfaces analogous to Eq.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The edge element method for planar surface geometries uses the method of stationary phase to eliminate the integral over the interface. 7 This technique is comparatively fast when ray tracing is used, but suffers significant reduction of speed when singularity and caustics ͑the envelope of rays either reflected or refracted by a manifold͒ are encountered, which can happen for complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the edge element technique was extended to model wave fields near fluid-solid interfaces. 7 Multi-Gaussian beam model was proposed by Wen and Breazeale 8 to model the wave field radiated by a circular piston transducer. Schmerr 9 followed this approach to compute the ultrasonic field near a curved fluid-solid interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%