2017
DOI: 10.1272/jnms.84.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography-Based Classification and Reporting System for the Malignant Risk of Thyroid Nodules

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to test the predictive value of a Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for malignant thyroid nodules.Methods: Ultrasonographic data was examined for 910 thyroid nodules with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. Nodules were placed into incomplete (category 0) or complete final categories (1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4, or 5) based on the presence and number of ultrasonographic features of malignancy, and the predictive value for the malignancy of nodules in categor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be pointed out that marked hypoechogenecity was common in our malignant nodules, with an OR of 6.5, higher than previously reported (24) indicating an increased risk of malignancy, whereas intranodular vascularity or illdefined margins were adequate for determining a high risk of malignancy. When hypoechogenecity was evaluated in combination with microcalcifications and with the shape, our results showed no improvement of sensitivity or higher AUC (data not shown).…”
contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…It should also be pointed out that marked hypoechogenecity was common in our malignant nodules, with an OR of 6.5, higher than previously reported (24) indicating an increased risk of malignancy, whereas intranodular vascularity or illdefined margins were adequate for determining a high risk of malignancy. When hypoechogenecity was evaluated in combination with microcalcifications and with the shape, our results showed no improvement of sensitivity or higher AUC (data not shown).…”
contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…On the other hand a higher percentage of sensitivity was documented in different countries across the globe: Philippines (100%) [35], China (92.7%) [17] and (98.15%) [18], Korea (95.5%) [21] and (96.6%) [20] and Egypt (98.3%) [36]. In our study, the specificity of the ACRTI-RADS for predicting the risk of malignancy was lower than that reported in many different countries: obtained in Korea (58.6%) [21] and (52.9%) [20], Brazil (51.4%) [15], China (47.84%) [18] and (89.1%) [19], Philippines (52.2%) [36], Malaysia (51.1%) [22] and (70.7%) [17], Singapore (90.4%) [16], Italy (57.2 %) [29] and 58.9% [33], Egypt (90.9%) [36] and Turkey (97.5%) [34]. In the current study, the positive predictive value of the thyroid ACR TI-RADS was higher than that obtained in Italy (12.8 %) [29] and Philippines (16.5%) [35], but lower than that found in Chile (49%) [14], China (73.31%) [18] and, Korea (44.5%) [21] and Turkey (63.3%) [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensitivity of ACRTI-RADS for predicting the risk of malignancy was markedly higher than that seen in Brazil (90%) [15] Chile (88%) [14] China (77.3%) [19], Malaysia (85.7%) [22] Italy (67.6%) [29] and 58.9% [33], Israel 86% [13] and Turkey (76%) [34]. On the other hand a higher percentage of sensitivity was documented in different countries across the globe: Philippines (100%) [35], China (92.7%) [17] and (98.15%) [18], Korea (95.5%) [21] and (96.6%) [20] and Egypt (98.3%) [36]. In our study, the specificity of the ACRTI-RADS for predicting the risk of malignancy was lower than that reported in many different countries: obtained in Korea (58.6%) [21] and (52.9%) [20], Brazil (51.4%) [15], China (47.84%) [18] and (89.1%) [19], Philippines (52.2%) [36], Malaysia (51.1%) [22] and (70.7%) [17], Singapore (90.4%) [16], Italy (57.2 %) [29] and 58.9% [33], Egypt (90.9%) [36] and Turkey (97.5%) [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kategori 4'te 4 ve daha fazla malignite işareti sayılabilecek özellik mevcuttur. Kategori 5 ise İİAB ile malign olduğu kanıtlanmış nodülleri içerir (10). Bir çalışmada İİAB sonucu önemi belirsiz atipi olarak bildirilen ve ultrasonografik olarak malignite şüphesi içeren iki bulgu olan hastalarda ameliyat materyallerinde kanser olarak raporlanma oranı %66,7 olarak bildirilmiştir (11).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified