2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography to assess body composition: Relevance of training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Furthermore, the validity of the muscle mass assessment by US is poor for very thin patients (low BMI) because of the lack of adequate visualization of the muscles. 11 In this regard, the inclusion of BMI as a phenotypic criterion in the GLIM model, such as we did in our model GLIM1, is not appropriate for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…21 Furthermore, the validity of the muscle mass assessment by US is poor for very thin patients (low BMI) because of the lack of adequate visualization of the muscles. 11 In this regard, the inclusion of BMI as a phenotypic criterion in the GLIM model, such as we did in our model GLIM1, is not appropriate for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In our study, 75% of patients were diagnosed as malnourished according to the SGA and 68.3% by the GLIM models (model 3). Thus, US and muscle mass (a component of nutrition status) assessment might represent a good, easy, and reliable instrument to provide (in conjunction with another tool) not only the initial diagnosis but also a short‐term follow‐up assessment, as long as it is performed by trained individuals 11 . The short‐term follow‐up evaluations are particularly important when nutrition therapy is delivered, for quality control or cost‐effectiveness analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations