1993
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(93)90051-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound and hip joint effusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, a wide range of values are reported for thickness of the anterior joint capsule. These values can be divided into two main groups: those with a mean of 5 mm, comparable to that in the present study (6,15,23,26,27), and those with a mean of 2-3 mm (2,4,12,13,28). This discrepancy was already observed by Terjesen and Osthus (7), who found it ''difficult to explain, as similar US tech-niques and anatomic landmarks seem to have been employed.''…”
Section: Normal Anatomysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In previous studies, a wide range of values are reported for thickness of the anterior joint capsule. These values can be divided into two main groups: those with a mean of 5 mm, comparable to that in the present study (6,15,23,26,27), and those with a mean of 2-3 mm (2,4,12,13,28). This discrepancy was already observed by Terjesen and Osthus (7), who found it ''difficult to explain, as similar US tech-niques and anatomic landmarks seem to have been employed.''…”
Section: Normal Anatomysupporting
confidence: 76%