2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
96
5
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
9
96
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As the amplitude increases, the number of compression and expansion cycles of the ultrasonic wave increases and, as a consequence of this, the ultrasonic wave is more effectively administered. Thus, a greater amplitude induces a more intense cavitation effect and improves the extraction process [37]. However, higher values over 70% are not recommended, since it can produce splashes and part of the extract may get wasted.…”
Section: Discussion On Each Variable That Influences the Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the amplitude increases, the number of compression and expansion cycles of the ultrasonic wave increases and, as a consequence of this, the ultrasonic wave is more effectively administered. Thus, a greater amplitude induces a more intense cavitation effect and improves the extraction process [37]. However, higher values over 70% are not recommended, since it can produce splashes and part of the extract may get wasted.…”
Section: Discussion On Each Variable That Influences the Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, higher values over 70% are not recommended, since it can produce splashes and part of the extract may get wasted. In addition, after a literature search, it was found that in some cases there were no significant differences at higher amplitudes [37,38].…”
Section: Discussion On Each Variable That Influences the Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE) to the removal of phenolic compounds from food materials was reported in various works, such as: mandarin peel (Nipornram, Tochampa, Rattanatraiwong, & Singanusong, 2018), black and purple rice bran (Das, Goud, & Das, 2017), pomegranate peel (Machado et al., 2019; Sharayei, Azarpazhooh, Zomorodi, & Ramaswamy, 2019), teff grains (Viell et al., 2020), and Brazilian hop (Almeida et al, 2019). At same time, UAE efficacy in the extraction of soluble sugars was observed for defatted soybean flakes (Karki et al, 2010), banana (Rayo‐Mendez, Gómez, & Tadini, 2019), and artichoke biomass (Polachini, Mulet, Telis‐Romero, & Cárcel, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology was widely used for a great diversity of compounds [3,15,16], but not for the extraction of acetogenins. In a single study reported by Leon-Fernandez et al [17], they found that the use of ultrasonic bath at 42 kHz for 3 h increased the qualitative extraction of acetogenins from soursop pulp compared to extraction by maceration, soxhlet method, and microwaves; however, further trials are required using an ultrasonic equipment with direct application, evaluating factors of amplitude, extraction time, temperature, and ultrasonic cycles (pulse-cycles), to optimize the extraction in different raw materials and different bioactive compounds [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%