1997
DOI: 10.1080/02841859709172081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound characteristics of five common soft-tissue tumours in the hand and forearm

Abstract: The study found 5 key ultrasound characteristics that were important for differentiating the tumours: existence or not of vessels, existence or not of a capsule, echogenicity, echo structure, and pattern of growth. Taking these traits into consideration should make it easier for the examiner to make the right diagnosis with a reasonable degree of accuracy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these sonographic features have been reported in the radiological literature favoring the benign nature of the mass. [8][9][10][11]13,15,16 However, specific sonographic descriptions of angioleiomyoma are rare. 8 The 10 tumors in our series showed vascularity on CD and PD examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these sonographic features have been reported in the radiological literature favoring the benign nature of the mass. [8][9][10][11]13,15,16 However, specific sonographic descriptions of angioleiomyoma are rare. 8 The 10 tumors in our series showed vascularity on CD and PD examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…8,11 Clinically, the major differential diagnoses included localized villonodular synovitis, lipomas, hemangiomas, nerve sheath tumors, and ganglia. [8][9][10][11][13][14][15][16] An accurate sonography can help in differential diagnosis with lipomas and ganglia. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, differentiating between angioleiomyomas and circumscribed haemangiomas, glomic tumors, and neural tumors is not possible on the basis of sonographic features alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8][9][10] The decrease of acoustic impedance due to the accumulation of densely packed cells explains the homogeneous hypoechogenicity of these lesions. Although color Doppler findings in glomus tumors are still controversial, 8,10,11 the presence of numerous vessels on histopathologic examination explains the hypervascular appearance noted on color or power Doppler sonography. In cases of subungual glomus tumors, however, compression of the mass by the nail and sound attenuation may hamper the obtention of good Doppler signals, resulting in a hypovascular appearance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No neurofibroma was identified as there might not have been any within the sheath or it/they might have been unnoticed because of their hypoechoic nodular sonographic appearances, which is exactly as the brachial plexus trunks/divisions at this level. [8][9][10][11][12] Beggs [9] described neurofibromas as well-defined solid hypoechoic masses that have faint distal acoustic enhancement. Reynolds et al [13] also reported that these tumors are often hypoechoic, with posterior acoustic enhancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%