2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound for the diagnosis of infectious diseases: Approach to the patient at point of care and at secondary level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound has great potential for the treatment of infectious diseases, especially when limited resources are available [145]. Abdominal [146], gastrointestinal [147], lung [148], and intrauterine ultrasound imaging [149] are widely used for the screening of clinical infectious diseases.…”
Section: Fighting Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound has great potential for the treatment of infectious diseases, especially when limited resources are available [145]. Abdominal [146], gastrointestinal [147], lung [148], and intrauterine ultrasound imaging [149] are widely used for the screening of clinical infectious diseases.…”
Section: Fighting Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…108 The usefulness of POCUS in bacterial infectious diseases has recently been reviewed, describing differentiation between cellulitis and abscesses, diagnosis of septic arthritis, identifying underlying causes of sepsis, and pneumonia. 109 Further US applications have been reported for leprosy, 110,111 rheumatic heart disease as sequelae of Streptococcus pyogenes infection, 112 mycetoma, 105 and opportunistic infections in patients living with HIV. 113,114 With US getting closer to the point of care and into the hands of treating physicians, its use in infectious diseases may increase, and further POCUS indications may become established.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3–5 ] However, these methods usually involved invasive tissue sampling and time‐consuming procedures; worse, none could effectively localize the lesion site. [ 6 ] Additionally, some clinical noninvasive imaging techniques, such as X‐ray, [ 7 ] ultrasonography, [ 8–9 ] computed tomography (CT), [ 10–11 ] positron emission tomography (PET), [ 12–13 ] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [ 14–15 ] are usually employed to assist diagnosis of infectious diseases at late‐stage in the clinic. They cannot discriminate bacterial infection from sterile inflammation, resulting in delayed or ineffective treatment of bacterial infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] However, these methods usually involved invasive tissue sampling and time-consuming procedures; worse, none could effectively localize the lesion site. [6] Additionally, some clinical noninvasive imaging techniques, such as X-ray, [7] ultrasonography, [8][9] computed tomography (CT), [10][11] positron emission tomography (PET), [12][13] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [14][15] are usually employed…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%