2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.840664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound image quality assessment: a framework for evaluation of clinical image quality

Abstract: Improvement of ultrasound images should be guided by their diagnostic value. Evaluation of clinical image quality is generally performed subjectively, because objective criteria have not yet been fully developed and accepted for the evaluation of clinical image quality. Based on recommendation 500 from the International Telecommunication Union -Radiocommunication (ITU-R) for such subjective quality assessment, this work presents equipment and a methodology for clinical image quality evaluation for guiding the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One frame generated with SASB-THI followed one frame generated with DRF-THI. Images from the same anatomic location were thereby recorded almost simultaneously with both techniques, and ideal sequences for comparison were generated (Hemmsen et al 2010(Hemmsen et al , 2012c.…”
Section: Equipment and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One frame generated with SASB-THI followed one frame generated with DRF-THI. Images from the same anatomic location were thereby recorded almost simultaneously with both techniques, and ideal sequences for comparison were generated (Hemmsen et al 2010(Hemmsen et al , 2012c.…”
Section: Equipment and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were informed that some of the images contained malignant focal liver lesions. An in-house developed software program (IQap) was used for the evaluation (Hemmsen et al 2010). Images obtained with the two techniques were shown separately, resulting in 254 evaluations by each radiologist for a total of 2,032 evaluations.…”
Section: Image Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation results are validated through measurements using a ProFocus scanner (BK Medical, Herlev, Denmark) equipped with a research interface for acquisition of beamformed RF data described in [8], [9]. Transmit-and receive delay profile, apodization, and excitation waveform are preset standardized settings from the manufacturer.…”
Section: B Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement setup consist of a 2202 ProFocus ultrasound scanner (BK-Medical, Herlev, Denmark) connected to a standard pc through a X64-CL Express camera link (Dalsa, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) and has previously been described in [5].…”
Section: B Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%