2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound induced cleaning of polymeric nanofiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the in-situ connection, the ex-situ connection requires high US power as the transducers are located far from the membrane surface. Most of the attempts if not all, on using US-assisted pressure-driven membrane technologies adopted the ex-situ configuration to avoid membrane damage [79]. However, as stated earlier, this requires highenergy consumption to convey the effects to the membrane surface.…”
Section: Integration Of Us With Pressure-driven Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the in-situ connection, the ex-situ connection requires high US power as the transducers are located far from the membrane surface. Most of the attempts if not all, on using US-assisted pressure-driven membrane technologies adopted the ex-situ configuration to avoid membrane damage [79]. However, as stated earlier, this requires highenergy consumption to convey the effects to the membrane surface.…”
Section: Integration Of Us With Pressure-driven Membrane Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was mentioned that the cost of fouling control is almost 30% of the total operating cost [132]. US technology was proposed by many researchers as an alternative cleaning technique to control NF membrane fouling [79,112,113]. US frequency is one of the main parameters that significantly affect the cleaning process.…”
Section: Nf-usmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Small bubbles may also act as microstreamers, attaching to the particles and clear them away from the surface. The number of bubbles created under the US irradiation and their growing size are directly affected by the operational parameters such as US power intensity, US frequency, and liquid viscosity [7] , [8] , [9] . Changes in the number and size of the bubbles in turn bring about the variation of energy released to the medium through the bubble explosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thombre et al. (2020) used ultrasound to clean the polymeric nanofiltration membrane and evaluated the effect of frequency and power of ultrasound on the efficiency of membrane cleaning. They resulted that the best ultrasound performance in membrane cleaning was achieved at a frequency of 24 kHz and power of 135 W, which can recover 85% of the water flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%