2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound velocity and attenuation of porcine soft tissues with respect to structure and composition: I. Muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The attenuation coefficients of subcutaneous fat, muscle, and bone for 16 ex vivo swine-tissue samples are summarized in Table 1. The attenuation coefficients of subcutaneous fat and muscle were similar to the reported values of 1.6-2.7 and 1.0-1.2 dB/cm/MHz, respectively [21], [22]. Figure 4 depicts the relationship between tissue thicknesses measured via the proposed ultrasound method and MR imaging.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The attenuation coefficients of subcutaneous fat, muscle, and bone for 16 ex vivo swine-tissue samples are summarized in Table 1. The attenuation coefficients of subcutaneous fat and muscle were similar to the reported values of 1.6-2.7 and 1.0-1.2 dB/cm/MHz, respectively [21], [22]. Figure 4 depicts the relationship between tissue thicknesses measured via the proposed ultrasound method and MR imaging.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A second challenge arises because acoustic attenuation due to absorption and scattering varies between different US propagation paths in heterogeneous tissue; a path with higher attenuation may significantly degrade system power transfer efficiency and data transfer reliability. For example, muscle tissue with a more unevenly distributed intramuscular fat content will exhibit greater acoustic attenuation 45 . Here, an external transceiver with a large-aperture, multi-element transducer array capable of focusing energy to the implant will allow steering of the US beam along a preferred path.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second challenge arises because acoustic attenuation due to scattering and absorption varies between different US propagation paths to the implant in heterogeneous tissue; a path with higher attenuation in tissue may significantly degrade power transfer efficiency and data transfer reliability of the system. For example, muscle tissue with a more unevenly distributed intramuscular fat content will exhibit greater acoustic attenuation 80 . Here too, an external transceiver with a large-aperture, multi-element transducer array capable of focusing US energy to the implant will allow for steering the US beam along a preferred path.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%