1986
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1120140105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural and cytochemical changes of the head components of human spermatids and spermatozoa

Abstract: The ultrastructural study of chromatin condensation simultaneously with the evolution of the perinuclear organelles was conducted in the spermatids and epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa of man with the aid of the “en bloc” alcoholic PTA staining and the EDTA regressive method. The round nuclei of young spermatids (steps 1, 2) were characterized by the persistence of nucleoli that were PTA positive, and the presence of a subacrosomal layer of well‐stained peripheral chromatin. In the beginning of the phase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of nuclear labelling at the late steps of spermiogenesis indicates that chromatin in spermatids is enriched in protamines, as has been shown by previous biochemical (Geremia et al, 1976;Loir & Lanneau, 1978;Grimes, 1986) and autoradiographic (Monesi, 1964(Monesi, , 1967Mayer & Zirkin, 1979) studies in several mammals. These observations are in agreement with ultrastructural and cytochemical data suggesting that, in man, protamines first appear in condensed nuclei of spermatids at steps 5-6 (Dadoune & Alfonsi, 1986). The lack of cytoplasmic labelling reinforces the hypothesis that protamines are not accumulated inside cytoplasm before their migration to the cell nucleus (Loir & Lanneau, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The increase of nuclear labelling at the late steps of spermiogenesis indicates that chromatin in spermatids is enriched in protamines, as has been shown by previous biochemical (Geremia et al, 1976;Loir & Lanneau, 1978;Grimes, 1986) and autoradiographic (Monesi, 1964(Monesi, , 1967Mayer & Zirkin, 1979) studies in several mammals. These observations are in agreement with ultrastructural and cytochemical data suggesting that, in man, protamines first appear in condensed nuclei of spermatids at steps 5-6 (Dadoune & Alfonsi, 1986). The lack of cytoplasmic labelling reinforces the hypothesis that protamines are not accumulated inside cytoplasm before their migration to the cell nucleus (Loir & Lanneau, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the rat, TP1 appears in the nuclei of step 12 spermatids (Heidaran et al, 1988) and disappears by step 17 (Oko et al, 1996a), while TP2 is seen in the nuclei of step 13 spermatids (Alfonso and Kistler, 1993) and disappears by step 16 (Oko et al, 1996a). The immunocytological detection of TP1 in human spermatids at steps 3 and 4 and of TP2 from step 1 to step 5 (Steger et al, 1998) is in accordance with earlier ultrastructural cytochemical findings on chromatin condensation (Dadoune and Alfonsi, 1986). The pattern of protamine deposition is roughly identical in all the mammals studied.…”
Section: Temporal Expression Of the Spermatid Basic Nucleoproteinssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…during the chromatin condensation process. The nuclear labelling density strongly increased in elongating spermatids (steps 5 and 6) and then sharply decreased from step 6 to step 8 [21]. In man, histone-to-protamine replacement occurs at the beginning of the spermatid maturation phase [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%