1980
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.46.3.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural injury to chick myocardial cells in vitro following "electric countershock".

Abstract: We studied the structural alterations that follow the application of currents similar to those used in clinical electric countershock procedures in cultured chick myocardial cells. Myocardial cells 48 hours in culture were subjected to electric field stimulation. The cells then were fixed for electron-microscope examination 30 seconds postshock. The ultrastructural alterations that appeared after an 80 V/cm shock included the appearance of >25% of the mitochondria per cell in the "condensed" configuration and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike ischemic infarction, myocardial injury was detected within 30 min of the application of electroshock, well before any inflammatory reaction. Electron micrographic findings of contraction bands, increased mitochondrial numbers, and electron-dense mitochondrial inclusions are common in descriptions of ischemic22' 23 and electrical myocardial injury,24 25 suggesting these may be nonspecific myocardial responses to severe injury. The intense local inflammatory reaction evolved to organization and replacement by scar in every dog examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike ischemic infarction, myocardial injury was detected within 30 min of the application of electroshock, well before any inflammatory reaction. Electron micrographic findings of contraction bands, increased mitochondrial numbers, and electron-dense mitochondrial inclusions are common in descriptions of ischemic22' 23 and electrical myocardial injury,24 25 suggesting these may be nonspecific myocardial responses to severe injury. The intense local inflammatory reaction evolved to organization and replacement by scar in every dog examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although several of these can, at least partly, be attributed to the preceding ventricular fibrillation, electroshocks per se may also depress ventricular function. In vitro , injury to the cardiac sarcolemmal membrane (so called electroporation) after defibrillation shocks (Jones et al. 1980) or high‐intensity electric field stimulation (Jones et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1980) or high‐intensity electric field stimulation (Jones et al. 1987) has been reported and may result in short‐lived myocardial functional deficits, although recovery probably occurs within seconds (Jones et al. 1980, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first explanation is a www.intechopen.com Cardiac Defibrillation -Prediction, Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Arrhythmic Events 86 direct damage on the myocardium. Animal models have demonstrated a vast array of potentially deleterious effects of DC shocks including alterations in cellular morphology, biochemical function, electrophysiologic function, and hemodynamic function (Tedeschi, 1954;Van Vleet, 1977;Babbs, 1980;Jones, 1980;Wilson, 1988;Trouton, 1992). Many of the morphologic, biochemical, electrophysiologic and hemodynamic adverse effects of high-intensity DC shocks reported in animals models have also been noted, although with lower frequency, in patients who have received DC shocks of clinically significant intensities.…”
Section: Mortality In Patients With Icdmentioning
confidence: 99%