“…Even at higher current density, the device still retains 10.9 Wh kg −1 of specific energy with a maximum specific power of 6.5 kW kg −1 . Ragone plot correlating the energy and power densities of the present device with previously reported phosphates devices is shown in Figure 10E, Clearly, the obtained energy density of 25.4 Wh kg −1 for as‐fabricated CuCNT device is considerably superior to earlier reported values for most of the phosphates based symmetric and asymmetric systems (see Table 1), including Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 //Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 (11.7 Wh kg −1 ), 14 Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 /PANI//AC (14.7 Wh kg −1 ), 15 Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 /GF//AC (7.6 Wh kg −1 ), 16 Cu 2 P 2 O 7 //Cu 2 P 2 O 7 (11.54 Wh kg −1 ), 42 Ni/NiHPO 4 //AC (26.8 Wh kg −1 ), 71 C‐Fe 2 P 4 O 12 //C‐Fe 2 P 4 O 12 (6.2 Wh kg −1 ), 72 MnPO 4 ∙H 2 O/GO//MnPO 4 ∙H 2 O/GO (5.78 Wh kg −1 ), 73 Na‐doped Ni 2 P 2 O 7 //Graphene (23.4 Wh kg −1 ), 74 TiP 2 O 7 //AC (13 Wh kg −1 ), 75 Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 //AC (16.64 Wh kg −1 ), 76 Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 //Mn 3 (PO 4 ) 2 (19.09 Wh kg −1 ), 76 Co 3 (PO 4 ) 2 ∙4H 2 O/GF//C‐Fe/PANI (24 Wh kg −1 ), 77 VOPO 4 ∙2H 2 O//VOPO 4 ∙2H 2 O (18.7 Wh kg −1 ) 78 . This fine supremacy of the device to store favorable amount of energy density even at high power operation can be attributed to the complementary constituents of composite electrode in addition to antique microstructural nanoflakes phosphate assembly.…”