2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr03147h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin, freestanding, stimuli-responsive, porous membranes from polymer hydrogel-brushes

Abstract: The fabrication of freestanding, sub-100 nm-thick, pH-responsive hydrogel membranes with controlled nano-morphology, based on modified poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) is presented. Polymer hydrogel-brush films were first synthesized by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) and subsequently detached from silicon substrates by UV-induced photo-cleavage of a specially designed linker within the initiator groups. The detachment was also assisted by pH-induced osmotic forces gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the interfacial physicochemical properties of polymer brushes can be conveniently varied by applying different polymer architectures or topologies, beyond linearity, often keeping constant the overall polymer composition. By this approach, the introduction of crosslinks, side chains or branchings along the grafted polymers enabled the precise tuning of brush swelling, its nanomechanical and nanotribological characteristics, while increasing the surface concentration of functional groups available for post‐modification …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the interfacial physicochemical properties of polymer brushes can be conveniently varied by applying different polymer architectures or topologies, beyond linearity, often keeping constant the overall polymer composition. By this approach, the introduction of crosslinks, side chains or branchings along the grafted polymers enabled the precise tuning of brush swelling, its nanomechanical and nanotribological characteristics, while increasing the surface concentration of functional groups available for post‐modification …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated how precise tuning of brush architecture can be exploited to independently modulate friction and/or protein resistance. This is the case for crosslinked brushes or brush-hydrogels, which have already proven to be extremely versatile films for a variety of materials formulations, including nanostructured and responsive membranes, [67] metal nanoparticles (NPs)-polymer hybrid coatings with tunable optical [68] and catalytic properties, [69] and supports for cell manipulation. [70 -72] As an example, the conformational restrictions that occur upon crosslinking densely grafted poly(hydrox-yethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) brushes with oligo (ethylene glycol) dimethacrylates (OEGDMA) during surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP), [73] lead to an increase in the amount of protein fouling that occurs upon exposure to serum.…”
Section: Effect Of Brush Architecture On Protein Resistance and Lubrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After deposition and post‐treatment of the nanospheres, the areas that are left uncovered are most commonly etched for pattern transfer; however, Kang et al . functionalized them in order to selectively direct the deposition of a modified poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel to those open areas between nanospheres (Fig. A).…”
Section: Nanosphere Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross‐sectional schemes of nanoporous membranes fabricated through NSL: (A) PHEMA hydrogel brush membrane fabricated using PS nanospheres , (B) SiN membrane fabricated through a Cr etch mask produced from PS nanospheres , (C) aluminum oxide membrane fabricated by patterned anodization through PS nanospheres , and (D) polymeric membrane lifted‐off from its processing substrate by dissolving a cellulose acetate sacrificial layer .…”
Section: Nanosphere Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%