Um Estudo Sobre O Comportamento Da Produtividade Industrial Do Trabalho Nas Regiões Do Brasil No Período De 1996 a 2010

Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital; Wanderley, Livio Andrade

doi:10.7147/geo15.4839

Cited by 5 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Os resultados da estimação do modelo híbrido do investimento no Brasil, no período em estudo, revelaram informações importantes para a análise econômica, dentre elas a de que o crescimento do produto ou da renda foi o principal determinante do investimento agregado no Brasil pós-plano Real, corroborando os resultados de Jacinto (1997), Rocha e Teixeira (1996), Melo e Rodrigues (1998), Ribeiro e Teixeira (2001), Galeano e Mata (2007) e Luporini e Alves (2010). Variações no investimento agregado estão altamente relacionadas com oscilações do produto.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…A formação bruta do capital fixo é fundamental para o crescimento econômico sustentável e a taxa de investimento é também importante neste processo porque irá determinar os níveis de crescimento no longo prazo e a performance da produção e emprego no país ( GALEANO;MATA 2007, 3). Segundo Puga e Torres (2007), os dados econômicos do Brasil corroboram essa forte relação entre investimento agregado e crescimento econômico.…”

Section: Investimento: Teoria E Evidências Empíricasunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determinantes do Investimento Agregado no Brasil no período 1995-2013

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar os determinantes do investimento agregado do Brasil, no período 1995-2013. Inicialmente foi delineado um panorama da evolução recente do investimento privado no país e sua importância para o desenvolvimento econômico. O artigo apresentou as principais teorias sobre o investimento, bem como um breve survey empírico dos principais estudos já desenvolvidos sobre o tema. A partir dos resultados empíricos e das teorias Keynesianas e neoclássicas do investimento, formulou-se o modelo econométrico Autorregressivo com Defasagens Distribuídas (ARDL). Os resultados demonstraram que o PIB, a carga tributária, a taxa de juros, as operações de crédito e os investimentos passados determinaram o investimento agregado no Brasil no período em estudo, obtendo sinais dos coeficientes estimados condizentes com a teoria econômica. Os resultados indicaram ainda que diminuir a carga tributária brasileira, sem obter déficits primários e com melhor alocação de recursos, em conjunto com a redução da taxa de juros que não gere pressão inflacionária, e o compromisso com políticas e programas de desenvolvimento econômico permanentes são caminhos para fomentar o investimento brasileiro.

show abstract

Section: Resultsunclassified

Section: Investimento: Teoria E Evidências Empíricasunclassified

Determinantes do Investimento Agregado no Brasil no período 1995-2013

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The process of openness of Brazilian economy prompted many changes in the industrial sector, bringing the necessary productive modernization and technological gains in order to be competitive at a global level (see, Feijó & Carvalho, 2002, Galeano & Wanderley, 2013a, 2013b. In terms of labor productivity, at first we saw considerable gains overall.…”

Section: Productivity Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By 2007-2008, labor productivity reached the same value as of 1996. Such evidence of a falling labor productivity prompted some authors to question the very process of openness of Brazilian economy as a beneficial one (see, among others, Galeano & Wanderley, 2013a, 2013b, Schettini & Azzoni, 2013, and Cavalcante & De Negri, 2014.…”

Section: Productivity Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the controversial impact of trade openness in labor productivity growth, there is some consensus among Brazilian scholars (Galeano & Wanderley, 2013a, 2013bSchettini & Azzoni, 2013) over the regional impacts, say, spatial reallocation of industrial activity among regions of Brazil. The main effect was a deconcentration of industrial activity from the South and Southeast regions towards North and, mainly, Northeast regions.…”

Section: Productivity Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regional Labor Market Differences in Brazil and Search Frictions: Some Structural Estimates

Oliveira

Carvalho

2016

Revista Brasileira De Economia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We estimate an equilibrium job search model for six metropolitan areas located in different regions of Brazil. Two mechanisms of wage determination are considered: wage posting by monopsony firms and Nash bilateral bargaining. In order to estimate the model, we use the non-parametric method developed by Bontemps, Robin, & van den Berg [2000. Equilibrium search with continuous productivity dispersion: Theory and nonparametric estimation. International Economic Review, 41(2), . There is significant heterogeneity among the estimated structural parameters for these regions. We succeed in rationalizing some well-known regional differences in wages, unemployment rates and productivity prevalent in Brazilian labor markets, thus offering new interpretations. Metropolitan regions in the Northeast have much lower λ 0 (arrival rate of wage offers for unemployed workers) and λ 1 (arrival rate of wage offers for employed workers) vis a vis areas in the South or Southeast regions. This is a new, and much more precise, result worth considering on the regional inequality debate in Brazil. Regional inequality in wages, besides being an outcome of its regional human capital distribution, can be rationalized as inequality of search frictions brought by differences in λ 1 . We found a key (indirect) role for search frictions when analysing productivity differences as well. Since search frictions impact simultaneously on monopsony power as well as on productivity, in order to understand better regional productivity differences we must deepen our analysis on how these structural parameters are differentiated by regions. Labor market frictions add important insights into the regional debate, something not captured by more traditional econometric reduced form approaches. *

show abstract

Productive efficiency and the future of regional disparities in Brazil

Schettini

Azzoni

2018

Nova econ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We use Stochastic Production Frontiers to estimate the recent levels and the evolution of productive efficiency across regions in Brazil. Results are available for agriculture, industry and services, as well as for total production. We observe a substantive efficiency growth exhibited by agriculture at the national level, which is counterbalanced by the poor performance of services. The regional results show that efficiency levels still replicate, in general, the regional inequality that marked the country’s history through decades. However, the efficiency growth reveals new signs of convergence among states, especially for industry, with effects on the aggregate production. This indicates that inequality trends in productive efficiency may be starting to change.

show abstract

Um Estudo Sobre O Comportamento Da Produtividade Industrial Do Trabalho Nas Regiões Do Brasil No Período De 1996 a 2010

Abstract: Un estudio sobre el comportamiento de la productividad industrial del trabajo en las regiones de Brasil durante el período 1996 a 2010 Edileuza Vital Galeano

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Determinantes do Investimento Agregado no Brasil no período 1995-2013

Determinantes do Investimento Agregado no Brasil no período 1995-2013

Regional Labor Market Differences in Brazil and Search Frictions: Some Structural Estimates

Productive efficiency and the future of regional disparities in Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About