2000
DOI: 10.1080/146532400539387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Umbilical cord blood processing with the Optipress II blood extractor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] To improve cell recovery and standardize the process, other approaches with automated or semiautomated methods have also been developed. [11][12][13] U In our CB bank, we have recently substituted the HES method by top-and-bottom fractionation with the Optipress II (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), to simplify the process and save time. With the aim of establishing the efficacy of the new technique, we have compared the two different methods in both development and routine phases.…”
Section: Study Design and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] To improve cell recovery and standardize the process, other approaches with automated or semiautomated methods have also been developed. [11][12][13] U In our CB bank, we have recently substituted the HES method by top-and-bottom fractionation with the Optipress II (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), to simplify the process and save time. With the aim of establishing the efficacy of the new technique, we have compared the two different methods in both development and routine phases.…”
Section: Study Design and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CB was centrifuged and volume reduced (Optipress II, Baxter Healthcare, IL, USA) to obtain a buffy coat, using standard procedures established for CB banking [8]. Samples from the buffy coat were removed for NC and CD34 ' count and CD34 ' viability testing.…”
Section: Cb Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Godinho et al. used centrifugation to deplete the buffy‐coat from the RBC [60,61]. The mean RBC loss in these studies was respectively 53% and 34% (range 5–77) in UCB units smaller than 80 ml, compared to 56% (range 32–75) in UCB units that were larger than 80 ml.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%