2006
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Umbilical cord blood transplantation and cytomegalovirus: posttransplantation infection and donor screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,16 Among 48 CMV-seropositive patients who achieved neutrophil engraftment after CBT, 40 patients (83%) showed positive test results in the present study. This incidence of CMV infection after CBT might be higher than in the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,16 Among 48 CMV-seropositive patients who achieved neutrophil engraftment after CBT, 40 patients (83%) showed positive test results in the present study. This incidence of CMV infection after CBT might be higher than in the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…8,9 Previous studies have shown that CMV infection occurs frequently in adult patients after CBT. 10,11 In addition, patients with CMV infection after CBT have a higher probability of secondary graft failure than those without CMV infection. 11 Toxicity of GCV may be associated with secondary graft failure in CBT recipients with CMV infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is controversy as to the significance of maternal cytomegalovirus (CMV) total antibody positivity. Maternal CMV serology has no relationship with CMV infection in CBT recipients, 34 and testing of the unit by PCR is not approved by the FDA. Our institutional policy, however, is to avoid a unit with positive CMV PCR or positive CMV saliva culture on the baby.…”
Section: Other Factors In Unit Selection: Idm Sterility and Hemoglomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 The CMV source after UCBT is almost exclusively of host origin because the incidence of congenital CMV infection is very low. 62 The frequency of CMV reactivation after UCBT is variable between studies, depending on patient characteristics and pretransplant seropositivity status. In contrast, the risk of CMV infection in UCB recipients is not associated with donor serology, which reflects the maternal exposure history rather than active or latent infection.…”
Section: Clinically Prognostic Value Of Thymopoietic Recovery After Ucbtmentioning
confidence: 99%