2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01207.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no proper study in the literature regarding recurrence of UPNS. Furthermore, some authors believe that UPNS is significantly different from SCPNS in that it is associated with low recurrence rates and absence of multiple tracts [11]. In our series, long‐term follow‐up of 46 patients revealed no evidence of recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, there is no proper study in the literature regarding recurrence of UPNS. Furthermore, some authors believe that UPNS is significantly different from SCPNS in that it is associated with low recurrence rates and absence of multiple tracts [11]. In our series, long‐term follow‐up of 46 patients revealed no evidence of recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Unfortunately, there is no full investigation on the recurrence of umbilical PNS in the literature. 19 During the current study's follow‐up, healing was achieved in all of the patients. Recurrences occurred only in 5 (4.4%) cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%