Una mirada a las elecciones presidenciales argentinas de 2011

Cherny, Nicolás

doi:10.18441/ibam.11.2011.44.135-139

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Existe una diversa variación de la metodología emprendida por Cristina Fernández, Dilma Rousseff y Xiomara Castro a los segmentos de su población. (Cherny, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Political feminization in Latin America: analysis of the discourses of Castro, Fernández and Rousseff

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The development of women in politics allows us to visualize how feminization influences the Latin American socio-political landscape. The study´s aim was to analyze the political discourses of a current president and two former presidents: Xiomara Castro from Honduras, Cristina Fernández from Argentina, and Dilma Rousseff from Brazil. Methods. A qualitative analysis was used by describing and interpreting political discourses and conducting interviews to experts. Results. Various similarities were evident between the discourses of Xiomara Castro, Cristina Fernández, and Dilma Rousseff such as the strategies employed in their discourses and the feminization in them, their most recurrent themes, their position regarding their opposition, among other aspects. Conclusion. Feminization in Latin American politics still has a long way to go because we live in societies with immutable gender roles, where masculinity bases persist.

show abstract

“…Existe una diversa variación de la metodología emprendida por Cristina Fernández, Dilma Rousseff y Xiomara Castro a los segmentos de su población. (Cherny, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Political feminization in Latin America: analysis of the discourses of Castro, Fernández and Rousseff

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Uno de los principales desafíos durante el gobierno de Kirchner fue abordar la crisis económica que afectaba al país. A partir de una plataforma disidente del peronismo tradicional, surgió la doctrina kirchnerista en Argentina, la cual perduraría durante varios años (Chenry 2011). En las elecciones de 2007, el PJ nuevamente empleó el método de la ley de neolemas, y presentó a Adolfo Rodríguez y Cristina Kirchner como candidatos simultáneos en dos coaliciones (Justicia, Unión y Libertad y Juntos por la Victoria, respectivamente).…”

Section: Análisis De Los Casos De Argentina Chile México Y Uruguayunclassified

“…Kirchner nuevamente ganó las elecciones presidenciales con el 54,11 % de los votos, con lo que superó el 45 % y evitó la segunda vuelta electoral. Inició así su segundo mandato y el tercero del kirchnerismo (Chenry 2011;Gallo 2018, 7-12).…”

Section: Análisis De Los Casos De Argentina Chile México Y Uruguayunclassified

Does More Internal Democracy Lead to Greater Electoral Success? The Selection of Presidential Candidates by Governing Parties in Latin America

Barrientos del Monte,

Pantoja López

2024

Colomb. int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective/context: This article analyzes the efficiency level of candidate selection methods for presidential elections in Latin America by governing parties, according to the degree of openness and internal fractionalization. The guiding hypothesis is that methods with greater openness generate greater internal fractionalization and, consequently, offer worse electoral outcomes; whereas more exclusionary methods generate less fractionalization and better electoral outcomes. Methodology: Twenty-three candidate selection processes for the presidency by ruling parties, and an equal number of presidential elections in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Uruguay between 1990 and 2020, under conditions of electoral integrity, are comparatively reviewed, and the degrees of openness are analyzed based on the proposal of an internal cohesion index and its effects on electoral success. Conclusions: From the cases analyzed, it can be concluded that there is no relationship between the openness of the selection methods and the fractionalization of the parties and electoral success, in this case, of those in government; and that while there is the idea that more internal democracy increases the probability of winning elections, this actually depends on other variables. Originality: The article aims to contribute to the literature on presidential candidate selection processes, particularly of governing parties, since elections are also an evaluation of the government, and the continuity or change is at stake. The selection method has effects on the parties and can define their efficiency or lack thereof in maintaining power.

show abstract

Una mirada a las elecciones presidenciales argentinas de 2011

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Political feminization in Latin America: analysis of the discourses of Castro, Fernández and Rousseff

Political feminization in Latin America: analysis of the discourses of Castro, Fernández and Rousseff

Does More Internal Democracy Lead to Greater Electoral Success? The Selection of Presidential Candidates by Governing Parties in Latin America

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About