2006
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.874405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unachievability of network coding capacity

Abstract: The coding capacity of a network is the supremum of ratios , for which there exists a fractional () coding solution, where is the source message dimension and is the maximum edge dimension. The coding capacity is referred to as routing capacity in the case when only routing is allowed. A network is said to achieve its capacity if there is some fractional () solution for which equals the capacity. The routing capacity is known to be achievable for arbitrary networks. We give an example of a network whose coding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, very few exact coding capacities have been rigorously derived in the literature. It is also known that the coding capacity might not be achievable [6].…”
Section: ]) Is Coding Solution In Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At present, very few exact coding capacities have been rigorously derived in the literature. It is also known that the coding capacity might not be achievable [6].…”
Section: ]) Is Coding Solution In Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the Vámos network, we demonstrate that some specific known networks can be constructed from matroids. These include the Butterfly network from [2], and parts of networks used to establish the insufficiency of linear network coding in [5] and the unachievability of network coding capacity in [6].…”
Section: ]) Is Coding Solution In Overmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Network examples are provided: for the exponential alphabet size and for the non-monotonicity of alphabet size by Rasala Lehman and Lehman [50]; for nonlinearity by Riis [71] and Dougherty et al [17]; and for non-reversibility by Riis [70] and Dougherty and Zeger [18]. Constructive algorithms to support multiple unicast sessions were proposed for example by Ho et al [33].…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%