2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ancr.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unambiguous evaluation of the relative photolysis rates of nitro indolinyl protecting groups critical for brain network studies

Abstract: a b s t r a c tNitrated indolinyl photoprotecting groups are crucial tools extensively used in the study of neuronal signal transduction. Mononitrated photolabile protecting groups have been used effectively, however, recent advances in the introduction of a second nitro group have shown improvement in the photo efficiency of neurotransmitter (agonist) release, albeit, to varying extents, depending on the assessment methods employed. An unambiguous method is discussed based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR),… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…73 These results are summarized in Figure 5, where each contributing state is labelled on the λM = 0.15 curve. For this specific value of λM, we also obtain quantitative agreement with the available experimental data, 21,34,36 with an estimated value of 3.88 for the MDNI/MNI ratio, against experimental values of ~ 4 (see Section S12 of the Supporting Information). The same considerations and results apply to α-MDNI-Glu and α-MNI-Glu (Table S6), for which the calculated ratio is 4.14.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…73 These results are summarized in Figure 5, where each contributing state is labelled on the λM = 0.15 curve. For this specific value of λM, we also obtain quantitative agreement with the available experimental data, 21,34,36 with an estimated value of 3.88 for the MDNI/MNI ratio, against experimental values of ~ 4 (see Section S12 of the Supporting Information). The same considerations and results apply to α-MDNI-Glu and α-MNI-Glu (Table S6), for which the calculated ratio is 4.14.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The numerical results are reported in Table 2. According to previous work, 21,34,36 the quantum yield of MDNI-Glu is about five times the quantum yield of MNI-Glu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…33,34 Although the second nitro at the C-5 is not directly participating in the mechanism, as we will show later, its presence results in an improved quantum yield by at least fivefold according to experimental data. [35][36][37] The mechanisms of uncaging for the 7-indolinyl system was studied by at least three groups using kinetic, fast pulse IR, and computation. 33,38,39 However, the most recently reported computational mechanisms of uncaging do not explain the difference in quantum yield, which is an important parameter, especially for consideration in future improved designs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical results are reported in Table 1. According to previous work, 23,38,40 the quantum yield of MDNI-Glu is about five times the quantum yield of MNI-Glu. By comparing the two ISC rate constants we calculated, we can estimate the relative quantum yield of the reaction of MDNI-Ac to be 3.75 times that of MNI-Ac, in good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…37,38 Although the second nitro at the C-5 is not directly participating in the mechanism, as we will show later, its presence results in an improved quantum yield by at least 5 fold according to experimental data. [39][40][41] The mechanisms of uncaging for the 7-indolinyl system was studied by at least three groups using kinetic, fast pulse IR, and computation. 37,42,43 However, the most recently reported computational mechanisms of uncaging do not explain the difference in quantum yield, which is an important parameter especially for consideration in future improved designs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%