2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01175-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertain storage prospects create a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, early models were intended for the traditional thermal power industry as the carbon sources, whereas new models have taken a broader adoption of plant-level emission sources of steel, cement, and chemical industries. Early models usually selected basins or reservoirs as the candidate storage sites with a relatively coarse spatial resolution, insufficient considerations of injection capacity constraints, and the exclusion of offshore sequestration, resulting in a non-equivalent matching between carbon sources and sinks on relevant spatial scales [31]. In general, models developed in recent years are dedicated to enriching databases, providing a considerable amount of information for carbon sources and sinks.…”
Section: Carbon Sources and Carbon Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, early models were intended for the traditional thermal power industry as the carbon sources, whereas new models have taken a broader adoption of plant-level emission sources of steel, cement, and chemical industries. Early models usually selected basins or reservoirs as the candidate storage sites with a relatively coarse spatial resolution, insufficient considerations of injection capacity constraints, and the exclusion of offshore sequestration, resulting in a non-equivalent matching between carbon sources and sinks on relevant spatial scales [31]. In general, models developed in recent years are dedicated to enriching databases, providing a considerable amount of information for carbon sources and sinks.…”
Section: Carbon Sources and Carbon Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study shows that the conversion of injected CO 2 to methane (CH 4 ) via microbial methanogenesis may be an important subsurface sink [35]. Second, the decomposition of current basins or reservoirs into high-resolution onshore and offshore storage sites through grid processing can effectively ensure spatial equivalence matching, and the inclusion of multiple constraints, such as storage potential, injection rate capacity, and storage security, will significantly improve the integrity and reliability of entire networks [31]. Third, a time and cost-efficient way of advancing CCUS is through the application of machine learning, which has been used for gauging the security and integrity of geological reservoirs.…”
Section: Multi-type High-resolution and Multi-constrained Carbon Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies argue CCS development would not be constrained by the lack of underground storage capacity. But, there is also plenty of criticism on such a conundrum around CCS ( Lane et al., 2021 ). Deep CCS beyond 90% CO 2 capture could be another technology option for the “last-mile” problem in decarbonization.…”
Section: Decarbonization Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful implementation of large-scale, low carbon NG-based hydrogen production also critically depends on the availability of CO 2 transport and storage infrastructure, 144 requiring strong policy measures to incentivise and/or facilitate this (see also Section 5). Further down the TRL scale we find solid oxide electrolysis and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%