2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainties of calculated Cramér‐Rao lower bounds: implications for quantitative MRS

Abstract: Analyzing results thanks to a CRB (or rCRB) based on experimental measurements might lead to misinterpretations. To exploit the rCRB* as rejection criteria, a conservative threshold level of 20% is recommended in order to limit the probability of false alarms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of EFU versus actual variance found in the evaluation of spectra with equal noise indicated that some of the EFUs overestimate the actual fit error, in particular for LCModel with limited SNR, even though the CRLB should be a lower limit of the fit error 30 . Of course, it has to be kept in mind that the indicated fit errors are just estimates 31 of the true fit error and may well deviate substantially; however, to find such large overestimation for multiple cases hints at a systematic bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of EFU versus actual variance found in the evaluation of spectra with equal noise indicated that some of the EFUs overestimate the actual fit error, in particular for LCModel with limited SNR, even though the CRLB should be a lower limit of the fit error 30 . Of course, it has to be kept in mind that the indicated fit errors are just estimates 31 of the true fit error and may well deviate substantially; however, to find such large overestimation for multiple cases hints at a systematic bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%