2019
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2019.1584678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for train-ballasted track–bridge system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiao et al (2019b) explored the effects of track irregularities on the random responses of the train-bridge system. With regard to the sensitivity analysis, Xin et al (2020b) applied the probability density evolution method to quantify the response variabilities of train-bridge random systems subjected to uncertainties, and then identified the sensitive input factors and ranked them in the order of importance based on the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Testing. For the reliability assessment, Li et al (2019k) provided the temporal reliability of the train-bridge coupled systems under a full probability distribution of track irregularities.…”
Section: Vehicle-bridge Random Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao et al (2019b) explored the effects of track irregularities on the random responses of the train-bridge system. With regard to the sensitivity analysis, Xin et al (2020b) applied the probability density evolution method to quantify the response variabilities of train-bridge random systems subjected to uncertainties, and then identified the sensitive input factors and ranked them in the order of importance based on the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Testing. For the reliability assessment, Li et al (2019k) provided the temporal reliability of the train-bridge coupled systems under a full probability distribution of track irregularities.…”
Section: Vehicle-bridge Random Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because that, in light of different dynamic indices, the sensitive factors are rather different. For example, the magnitude of VACB is mainly affected by vertical profile irregularities, but LACB is significantly influenced by alignment irregularities; although WRLF is one of the sources for LACB, the WRLF is rather sensitive to the short-wavelength irregularities while LACB is sensitive to the long-wavelength irregularities [44]. According to the theory of random process, this indicates that there are no obvious or only weak probabilistic correlations among them, and correspondingly, they can be considered as mutually independent processes.…”
Section: Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most of the HEV/EV powertrain models are nonlinear which raises the following question, "What would be the consequences if the SA results are incorrect?" On the other hand, global sensitivity analyses (GSA) [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], which avoids the aforementioned shortcomings, are only employed by a minority of designers. From the literature published on SA-focused studies for different HEV [46][47][48] and EV [50][51][52] powertrain topologies in both commercial [51][52][53] and passenger [54][55] vehicles, a remarkable lack of the availability of data can be seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%