2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-021-00851-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty evaluation and correlation analysis of single-particle energies in phenomenological nuclear mean field: an investigation into propagating uncertainties for independent model parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering two sets of frequently used WS potential parameters, we present the calculated quadrupole deformation β 2 and hexadecapole deformation β 4 in table 3 for nine eveneven nuclei on the selected β 4 deformation island (see figure 3 in [34] for a systematic comparision with more data). As seen above, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By considering two sets of frequently used WS potential parameters, we present the calculated quadrupole deformation β 2 and hexadecapole deformation β 4 in table 3 for nine eveneven nuclei on the selected β 4 deformation island (see figure 3 in [34] for a systematic comparision with more data). As seen above, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the MM models never stop developing, including the microscopic and macroscopic parts, e.g. cf [25,[32][33][34][35]. Part of the aims in this work are listed below: (1) to reproduce nuclear quadrupole deformations with two sets of Woods-Saxon (WS) parameters, and provide a comparison with experimental data and other theoretical results; (2) to improve the description of nuclear masses, by comparing with the results with and without consideration of the hexadecapole deformation; (3) to test the WS parameter sets and the present MM method to some extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a nucleus, the equilibrium shape in the ground state is indicated by , which can be obtained by a standard potential-energy-surface calculation (e.g., see Refs. [22][23][24][25] and references therein). The deformation correction energy is calculated using [26,27]…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple technique for quantitatively assessing the importance of input parameters is based on the calculation of 'raw' correlation coefficients: the simple (i.e., Pearson) and the partial one [29,30]. Additional techniques would be based on rank correlation coefficients, obtained when the numerical values of the magnitudes are replaced by their rank A simple technique for quantitatively assessing the importance of input parameters is based on the calculation of 'raw' correlation coefficients: the simple (i.e., Pearson) and the partial one [29,30]. Additional techniques would be based on rank correlation coefficients, obtained when the numerical values of the magnitudes are replaced by their rank [11].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some negative correlations with PCT are obtained for the parameters such as discharge coefficient in the break, gap conductance, initial condition of ACC, and pressure of RCS. A simple technique for quantitatively assessing the importance of input parameters is based on the calculation of 'raw' correlation coefficients: the simple (i.e., Pearson) and the partial one [29,30]. Additional techniques would be based on rank correlation coefficients, obtained when the numerical values of the magnitudes are replaced by their rank [11].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%