2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty in stretch extrapolation of laminar flame speed from expanding spherical flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from Saeed et al [7] were estimated from the pressure-time history, which could be affected by flame instability and heat loss. There are some inconsistencies in the flame speed extrapolation using spherical flames with different chamber shapes and sizes especially when the mixture Lewis number is much less or larger than unity [42]. Conservative estimates of radiation-induced uncertainty in spherically expanding flames [27] predict a maximum inhibition of 3.7% for the PU measurements and 6.1% for the TAMU measurements.…”
Section: Laminar Flame Speed Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Saeed et al [7] were estimated from the pressure-time history, which could be affected by flame instability and heat loss. There are some inconsistencies in the flame speed extrapolation using spherical flames with different chamber shapes and sizes especially when the mixture Lewis number is much less or larger than unity [42]. Conservative estimates of radiation-induced uncertainty in spherically expanding flames [27] predict a maximum inhibition of 3.7% for the PU measurements and 6.1% for the TAMU measurements.…”
Section: Laminar Flame Speed Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The un-stretched flame propagation speed S b,0 is then calculated through extrapolation to zero stretch using the linear stretch relation (for mixtures with near unity Lewis number), although the curvature method [22] gives results within 5%. Low extrapolation uncertainty is expected, as -0.1 < Ma x Ka < 0.2 for all measurements [25]. Extrapolation endpoints are determined iteratively by locating the range where the residuals from the fit are below a threshold value and using this range to compute a new fit.…”
Section: Princeton University Flamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a variety of experimental data sets for CH 4 /air reported in the literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] is collected to show the differences in S 0 u measurement using the OPF method. Moreover, effects of mixture preparation [5,9,27,28], ignition [29][30][31][32], buoyancy [33,34], instability [35][36][37], confinement [38][39][40][41], radiation [9,10,[41][42][43][44], nonlinear stretch behavior [22,[45][46][47][48][49], and extrapolation [50,51] on the discrepancies in S 0 u measurement are examined based on 1-D simulation of propagating planar and spherical flames. It should be noted that Egolfopoulos et al [5] have recently reviewed possible sources of uncertainty in S 0 u measurement using the OPF method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%