2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40192-020-00168-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation in Computational Materials Science and Simulation-Assisted Materials Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective properties for each microstructure occupying Ω RVE were computed using finite element simulations and Hill's averaging theorem [41,42] (see Supplementary Information: Structure-Property linkage). We assumed a contrast ratio of 50 in the properties of the two phases, i.e., E 1 /E 0 = 50 (where E 0 , E 1 are the elastic moduli of phases 0 and 1) 5 and a 1 /a 0 = 50 (where a 0 , a 1 are the conductivities of phases 0 and 1). In the following plots, phase 1 is always shown as white and phase 0 always as black.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effective properties for each microstructure occupying Ω RVE were computed using finite element simulations and Hill's averaging theorem [41,42] (see Supplementary Information: Structure-Property linkage). We assumed a contrast ratio of 50 in the properties of the two phases, i.e., E 1 /E 0 = 50 (where E 0 , E 1 are the elastic moduli of phases 0 and 1) 5 and a 1 /a 0 = 50 (where a 0 , a 1 are the conductivities of phases 0 and 1). In the following plots, phase 1 is always shown as white and phase 0 always as black.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While significant progress has been made in the forward and backward modeling of the process-structure and structureproperty linkages and in capturing the nonlinear and multiscale processes involved [3], much fewer efforts have attempted to integrate uncertainties which are an indispensable component of materials' analysis and design [4,5] since a) process variables do not fully determine the resulting microstructure but rather a probability distribution on microstructures [6], b) noise and incompleteness are characteristic of experimental data that are used to capture process-structure (most often) and structure-property relations [7], c) models employed for the process-structure or structure-property links are often stochastic and there is uncertainty in their parameters or form, especially in multiscale formulations [8], and d) model compression and dimension reduction employed in order to gain efficiency unavoidably leads to some loss of information which in turn gives rise to predictive uncertainty [9]. As a result, microstructure-sensitive properties can exhibit stochastic variability which should be incorporated in the design objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As computing efficiency increased, several authors identified Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) as a powerful technique for optimizing Calphad model parameters and simultaneously determining their uncertainty with respect to the data [2,3]. Readers interested in further discussion of recent developments in Bayesian UQ for ICME, with application to Calphad, are directed to a recent review [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, parameter calibration has been mostly uncertaintyagnostic and computational predictions have been rarely provided with an error bar. However, approaches based on Bayesian inference provide a convenient framework for uncertainty quantification, which is crucial in the verification of simulation results [2]. We will demonstrate how such a methodology can be applied to calibrate a thermodynamic model to experimental data of binary W-Ti alloys and to determine their degree of uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%