Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2018/660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unchaining the Power of Partial Delete Relaxation, Part II: Finding Plans with Red-Black State Space Search

Abstract: Red-black relaxation in classical planning allows to interpolate between delete-relaxed and real planning. Yet the traditional use of relaxations to generate heuristics restricts relaxation usage to tractable fragments. How to actually tap into the red-black relaxation's interpolation power? Prior work has devised red-black state space search (RBS) for intractable red-black planning, and has explored two uses: proving unsolvability, generating seed plans for plan repair. Here, we explore the generation of plan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial delete relaxation methods aim to mitigate these drawbacks by considering some delete information. Two such techniques are red-black planning (Domshlak, Hoffmann, and Katz 2015;Fickert, Gnad, and Hoffmann 2018), where some state variables are un-relaxed, and partial delete relaxation with explicit conjunctions (Haslum 2012;Keyder, Hoffmann, and Haslum 2012;Fickert, Hoffmann, and Steinmetz 2016), where some combinations of facts are treated atomically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial delete relaxation methods aim to mitigate these drawbacks by considering some delete information. Two such techniques are red-black planning (Domshlak, Hoffmann, and Katz 2015;Fickert, Gnad, and Hoffmann 2018), where some state variables are un-relaxed, and partial delete relaxation with explicit conjunctions (Haslum 2012;Keyder, Hoffmann, and Haslum 2012;Fickert, Hoffmann, and Steinmetz 2016), where some combinations of facts are treated atomically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%