2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncoupling clutch size, prolactin, and luteinizing hormone using experimental egg removal

Abstract: Article (refereed) -postprintRyan, Calen P.; Dawson, Alistair; Sharp, Peter J.; Williams, Tony D. 2015. Uncoupling clutch size, prolactin, and luteinizing hormone using experimental egg removal.Contact CEH NORA team at noraceh@ceh.ac.ukThe NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner.Uncoupling clutch size, prolactin, and luteinizing hormone using experimental eg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Egg stimuli are required for maintaining elevated PRL titers in other avian species (reviewed in Angelier et al, 2016;Buntin, 1996;Sockman et al, 2006), therefore one may have predicted that a greater number of eggs could have led to a greater PRL peak at the time of chick hatching. On the other hand, this result may not be surprising as PRL does not appear to influence egg laying or clutch size determination in zebra finches (Ryan et al, 2015(Ryan et al, , 2014 or American kestrels (Falco sparverius; Sockman et al, 2000). In addition, this relationship is observed in both sexes, so this phenomenon cannot be limited to the fact that only females lay eggs.…”
Section: Relationship Between Prl Parental Behavior and Reproductivmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Egg stimuli are required for maintaining elevated PRL titers in other avian species (reviewed in Angelier et al, 2016;Buntin, 1996;Sockman et al, 2006), therefore one may have predicted that a greater number of eggs could have led to a greater PRL peak at the time of chick hatching. On the other hand, this result may not be surprising as PRL does not appear to influence egg laying or clutch size determination in zebra finches (Ryan et al, 2015(Ryan et al, , 2014 or American kestrels (Falco sparverius; Sockman et al, 2000). In addition, this relationship is observed in both sexes, so this phenomenon cannot be limited to the fact that only females lay eggs.…”
Section: Relationship Between Prl Parental Behavior and Reproductivmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…4A). Although this theory has been tested and supported by a few studies El Halawani et al, 1996;Crisostomo et al, 1998;Sockman et al, 2000;Ouyang et al, 2011;but see Williams, 2012;Ryan et al, 2014Ryan et al, , 2015, the influence of stressors on prolactin levels has not been integrated into this theory. To the best of our knowledge, the combined influence of stress on prolactin levels and laying effort has rarely been investigated (but see Rozenboim et al (2004)).…”
Section: Prolactin Stress and Clutch Size Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By linking environmental conditions, stress, prolactin regulation and breeding success, we will highlight the potential role of this hormone in mediating allostasis in parent birds. Finally, we will also review the potential role of prolactin in mediating other life history decisions such as clutch size (Sockman et al, 2006;Ryan et al, 2015) and the timing of molt (Dawson, 2006). By evaluating the influence of stressors on circulating prolactin levels during these stages, we will also raise new hypotheses regarding the potential of prolactin to regulate the orchestration of the annual cycle when environmental changes occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found no differences in the largest ovarian follicle diameter between groups, as all birds had a distinct follicular hierarchy with large yolky follicles. PRL has been associated with the end of lay and ovulation in birds (Ryan et al, 2015;Sockman et al, 2000), but other studies show that PRL manipulation does not inhibit or delay laying rates or ovulation (Li et al, 2011;Opel and Proudman, 1984). In ovaries, FSH leads to the development of the follicular hierarchy and release of sex steroids, while LH stimulates ovulation and steroidogenesis (Johnson, 2015;Mishra et al, 2020).…”
Section: Effects On Gonads and Gonadal Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, experiments in doves show that systemic and intracerebroventricular (icv) PRL injections, at levels akin to those circulating during parental care, maintain parental responses and reduce gonad size and LH plasma levels (Buntin et al, 1991Buntin and Tesch, 1985;Janik and Buntin, 1985). The evidence for an inhibitory effect of PRL on the HPG axis has been connected to its possible role in photorefractoriness (Dawson and Sharp, 1998), clutch size regulation (Ryan et al, 2015;Sockman et al, 2000) and parental care (Angelier et al, 2016;Buntin, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%