2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27433-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering Social Media Reaction Pattern to Protest Events: A Spatiotemporal Dynamics Perspective of Ferguson Unrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most of the users act as passive listeners or broadcasters, Twitter conversations are usually driven by a small elite of influential accounts [5,38]. The composition of such elite varies depending on the main subject of the conversation and on the interaction medium [33].…”
Section: Communication Among the Elitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the users act as passive listeners or broadcasters, Twitter conversations are usually driven by a small elite of influential accounts [5,38]. The composition of such elite varies depending on the main subject of the conversation and on the interaction medium [33].…”
Section: Communication Among the Elitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, social movements are not merely instances of independent collective actions or protest events, but need to be investigated within their social, temporal and geographical contexts [1]. Empirically, however, in part due to the lack of proper analytical tools, studies (including social media studies) often analyze single events or movements via a case-study approach [7][8][9][10], or consider a large number of movement-related events independently of their relationships in time and space [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related work on reactions to events expressed in social media can be differentiated by the category of the event the reaction is related to and by the purpose of the study. Event categories include natural disasters (Hashimoto et al 2013), speeches (Amanatullah et al 2013), health-related events (Szomszor et al 2011, Fung et al 2015, Nikfarjam et al 2015, Meaney et al 2016, advertising campaigns (Rodrigues 2016), criminal and terrorist events (Burnap et al 2014, Kounadi et al 2015McEnery et al 2015), protests or unrest (He et al 2015), and entertainment-related events (Lipizzi et al 2016). The purpose of such studies includes investigating the diffusion of reactions (Burnap et al 2014), analysing perception of events (i.e.…”
Section: Reactions To Events In Lbsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of such studies includes investigating the diffusion of reactions (Burnap et al 2014), analysing perception of events (i.e. the attitudes and concerns triggered by an event) (Hashimoto et al 2013, He et al 2015, Kounadi et al 2015, Meaney et al 2016, identifying trusted or credible information sources (Szomszor et al 2011), event detection from reactions including monitoring (Amanatullah et al 2013, Nikfarjam et al 2015, assessment of the effectiveness of advertising campaigns (Rodrigues 2016), sales prediction (Lipizzi et al 2016) or interrelationships with news media (Castillo et al 2014, Tsytsarau et al 2014, Fung et al 2015, McEnery et al 2015. Importantly, the last topic explicitly makes the link between another mediumthe influence of the press on the reactions to an event, making clear that social media reactions cannot be considered as purely a function of a given event, but rather a discourse conducted through a multitude of media around an event.…”
Section: Reactions To Events In Lbsmmentioning
confidence: 99%