Uncrewed aircraft systems versus motorcycles to deliver laboratory samples in west Africa: a comparative economic study

Abstract

Background Transportation of laboratory samples in low-income and middle-income countries is often constrained by poor road conditions, difficult geographical terrain, and insecurity. These constraints can lead to long turnaround times for laboratory diagnostic tests and hamper epidemic control or patient treatment efforts. Although uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS)-ie, drones-can mitigate some of these transportation constraints, their cost-effectiveness compared with land-based transportation systems is unclear. MethodsWe did a comparative economic study of the costs and cost-effectiveness of UAS versus motorcycles in Liberia (west Africa) for transportation of laboratory samples under simulated routine conditions and public health emergency conditions (based on the 2013-16 west African Ebola virus disease epidemic). We modelled three UAS with operational ranges of 30 km, 65 km, and 100 km (UAS30, UAS65, and UAS100) and lifespans of 1000 to 10 000 h, and compared the costs and number of samples transported with an established motorcycle transportation programme (most commonly used by the Liberian Ministry of Health and the charity Riders for Health). Data for UAS were obtained from Skyfire (a UAS consultancy), Vayu (a UAS manufacturer), and Sandia National Laboratories (a private company with UAS research experience). Motorcycle operational data were obtained from Riders for Health. In our model, we included costs for personnel, equipment, maintenance, and training, and did univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses for UAS lifespans, range, and accident or failures. Findings Under the routine scenario, the per sample transport costs were US$0•65 (95% CI 0•01-2•85) and $0•82 (0•56-5•05) for motorcycles and UAS65, respectively. Per-sample transport costs under the emergency scenario were $24•06 (95% CI 21•14-28•20) for motorcycles, $27•42 (95% CI 19•25-136•75) for an unadjusted UAS model with insufficient geographical coverage, and $34•09 (95% CI 26•70-127•40) for an adjusted UAS model with complementary motorcycles. Motorcycles were more cost-effective than short-range UAS (ie, UAS30). However, with increasing range and operational lifespans, UAS became increasingly more cost-effective.Interpretation Given the current level of technology, purchase prices, equipment lifespans, and operational flying ranges, UAS are not a viable option for routine transport of laboratory samples in west Africa. Field studies are required to generate evidence about UAS lifespan, failure rates, and performance under different weather conditions and payloads.

Drone versus ambulance for blood products transportation: an economic evaluation study

“…Globally, we found exceptionally few scientific studies that reported on the economic perspective of drone technology in healthcare services [ 13 , 16 ]. This may be due to the slow-paced implementation of drone usage for medical purposes.…”

“…Apart from expertise, infrastructure and regulations [ 14 , 15 ], one of the main barriers to surmount is the question of cost-effectiveness of drone usage. Thus far, there is only one study that attempted to answer the question of cost-effectiveness of drone for medical products transportation, the finding of which showed that motorcycles were more cost-effective than short-range (< 65 km) drones [ 16 ]. This result, however, may not be applicable in all types of geographical terrains or traffic.…”

Adding unmanned aerial vehicles to HIV supply chains in remote settings: modeling feasibility and cost in Turkana, Kenya

“…Determining the cost to utilize UAVs for routine transport of specimens is difficult considering the multiple assumptions that must be accounted for, including the type of UAV and the associated operational costs. A nationwide study in Liberia 12 determined that fully replacing the motorbike transport program with UAVs for lab samples would be more expensive to operate. Phillips et al 13 conducted a costing analysis that compared UAV-based systems to ground-based for the transport of laboratory samples from health facilities to labs in Malawi and found higher costs but lower travel times when using small, battery-powered UAVs for transport.…”

Development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) networks delivering early defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in areas lacking timely access to emergency medical services (EMS) in Germany: a comparative economic study

“…The same applied to the use of UAV within mass casualty incidents showing their feasibility. 35 36 Lastly in regard to medical transport, UAV have been successfully used to transport laboratory samples, 37 blood products, 38 39 vaccines 40 and flotation devices to prevent drowning. 41 The use of AED equipped UAV can therefore be seen as a reasonable extension of the previous applications.…”