2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underestimation of boreal forest soil carbon stocks related to soil classification and drainage

Abstract: Soil organic carbon (C), accumulated over millennia, comprise more than half of the C stored in boreal and temperate forest landscapes. We used the Norwegian national forest inventory and soil survey network (n = 719, no deep organic soils) to explore the validity of a deterministic model representation of this pool (Yasso07). We statistically compared simulated and measured soil C stocks and related differences (measured -simulated) to site factors (drainage, topography, climate, vegetation, C-to-N ratio, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Importantly, few sites (whether NEON or otherwise) span the full range of drainage classes, and while each of the three we assessed shows a grossly similar qualitative trend, not one shows the clearly significant pattern that we observed at the continental scale, or others have reported at regional and continental scales (Dalsgaard et al 2016;Davidson 1995;Davidson and Lefebvre 1993;Wills et al 2013). Thus, expecting drainage sequences to align neatly with SOC stocks on any landscape is unwarranted, despite the convincing pattern from the largescale dataset, which has been documented in individual site-level studies elsewhere (Raymond et al 2011;Richardson and Stolt 2013;Webster et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…3). Importantly, few sites (whether NEON or otherwise) span the full range of drainage classes, and while each of the three we assessed shows a grossly similar qualitative trend, not one shows the clearly significant pattern that we observed at the continental scale, or others have reported at regional and continental scales (Dalsgaard et al 2016;Davidson 1995;Davidson and Lefebvre 1993;Wills et al 2013). Thus, expecting drainage sequences to align neatly with SOC stocks on any landscape is unwarranted, despite the convincing pattern from the largescale dataset, which has been documented in individual site-level studies elsewhere (Raymond et al 2011;Richardson and Stolt 2013;Webster et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Carbon sequestration in forest soils plays an important strategic role (Jobbágy & Jackson, 2000). Boreal forest soils, which accumulate up to five times more organic carbon (OC) than plant biomass or about 85% OC in forest ecosystems, are a reservoir for long-term storage of boreal C and a significant contributor to global C storage (Dalsgaard et al, 2016;Jones et al, 2009;Martin et al, 2005;Pan et al, 2011). In European forest soils, SOC accumulation is approximately 1.5 times higher than in tree stem biomass (de Vries et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where labile groups are chemically defined (by solubility; values are provided in Table S1) and constrained by empirical mass loss, the parameters determining humus dynamics are primarily constrained by soil C stock data. Application to Norwegian conditions is further described in Dalsgaard, Astrup, et al (2016) and Dalsgaard, Lange, et al (2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each plot is initialized by a spin‐up to equilibrium in five pools (e.g., the three labile + insoluble + humus) using the average litter input 1990–2016 grouped by site index and dominant tree species (Table S6). Forested plots are then subject to a pre‐simulation or “backcast” of 30 years (6 × 5 year time steps) as described in Dalsgaard, Astrup, et al (2016) and Dalsgaard, Lange, et al (2016). This backcast is based on land use prior to NFI plot establishment and national standards for harvest volumes and ages for the relevant time period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%