2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding a firm's openness decisions in innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
168
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
168
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarities between Collaborative Innovation and Open Innovation are apparent (Chesbrough, 2003;Drechsler and Natter, 2012;Mueller, 1962;Von Hippel, 1988), as they are both concepts showing that the sources for innovation are no longer largely internal in an organization, but have spread to many loci in the outside environment.…”
Section: Types Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarities between Collaborative Innovation and Open Innovation are apparent (Chesbrough, 2003;Drechsler and Natter, 2012;Mueller, 1962;Von Hippel, 1988), as they are both concepts showing that the sources for innovation are no longer largely internal in an organization, but have spread to many loci in the outside environment.…”
Section: Types Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, patent-protected innovation and patent effectiveness are found to be important in existing literature, e.g. in Drechsler and Natter (2012) and Laursen and Salter (2014). Furthermore, owning patents increases visibility and legitimacy, and it improves attractiveness of the firm to other learning partners (Riccobono, Bruccoleri, and Perrone 2015).…”
Section: Organisational Antecedents Of Opennessmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Diversity in knowledge relationships is seen as crucially important to university spin-offs, especially when the knowledge originates outside their own technical domain and generates complementarities, for instance, application knowledge and knowledge on access to funding and launching customers (Colombo and Grilli 2010;Drechsler and Natter 2012). Getting knowledge through different partners also provides a broader ability of sensing opportunities that enables a larger variety in strategy formulation and adaptation (Teece 2007), although too much diversity may not work beneficially due to lack of management ability (e.g.…”
Section: Openness In Knowledge Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Informed by the growing literature on open innovation (Chesbrough, 2003;Dahlander and Gann, 2010;Drechsler, and Natter, 2012;Fey and Birkinshaw, 2005), we expected that the more firms rely on different external knowledge sourcing modes, the better they would perform in terms of innovation. While we find some evidence that both external technology sourcing and R&D cooperation positively impact innovation in isolation, we hardly find evidence of an additional gain in performance when both are used simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%