2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and coping with immigration detention: Social identity as cure and curse

Abstract: Over 29,000 foreign nationals are detained yearly in British Immigration Removal Centres for undefined periods. This study investigated the role played by social identities in the way detainees are affected by, make sense of, and deal with detention. An opportunity sample of 40 detainees was interviewed on topics including support, identity, and well-being, and data were analysed using theoretical thematic analysis. Participants struggled with loss of social networks, loss of rights, loss of agency, and joinin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations are consistent with social identity literature, which recognises stigma's damaging potential for group members' well-being (Major & O'Brien, 2005) and positions stigma as a 'Social Curse' that may deny valuable support to group members (Kellezi, Bowe, Wakefield, McNamara, & Bosworth, 2018;Kellezi & Reicher, 2012;Stevenson, McNamara, & Muldoon, 2014). Social Curse processes are the antithesis of Social Cure processes (Jetten, Haslam, & Haslam, 2012): rather than providing curative support resources, groups that are stigmatised can lead to vulnerability and isolation.…”
Section: The Social Curse Of Intergroup Helpingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These observations are consistent with social identity literature, which recognises stigma's damaging potential for group members' well-being (Major & O'Brien, 2005) and positions stigma as a 'Social Curse' that may deny valuable support to group members (Kellezi, Bowe, Wakefield, McNamara, & Bosworth, 2018;Kellezi & Reicher, 2012;Stevenson, McNamara, & Muldoon, 2014). Social Curse processes are the antithesis of Social Cure processes (Jetten, Haslam, & Haslam, 2012): rather than providing curative support resources, groups that are stigmatised can lead to vulnerability and isolation.…”
Section: The Social Curse Of Intergroup Helpingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Even the availability of social support does not inevitably prevent Social Curse processes, as evidenced by Kellezi, Bowe, Wakefield, McNamara, and Bosworth's () work with immigrants in UK Immigration Removal Centres. Despite reporting high distress, some detainees did not want to share their negative experiences with family and friends for fear of upsetting them, which led to a lack of desperately needed social support.…”
Section: The Darker Side Of the Social Cure: Intra‐group Social Cursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being a member of such a group has been shown to confer many benefits (see Wakefield, Bowe, Kellezi, McNamara, & Stevenson, 2019, for a review). In turn, these benefits have been shown to enhance health/well-being across numerous populations and contexts, from people with multiple sclerosis (Wakefield, Bickley, & Sani, 2013) and detainees (Kellezi, Bowe, Wakefield, McNamara, & Bosworth, 2019) to people recovering from stroke (Haslam et al, 2008) and new mothers (Seymour-Smith, Cruwys, Haslam, & Brodribb, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%